Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24026478›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2013

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for the evaluation and triage of chest pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.

Swee Han Lim, Venkataraman Anantharaman, Felix Sundram, Edwin Shih-Yen Chan, Ee Sin Ang, Sui Lan Yo, Edward Jacob, Anthony Goh, Say Beng Tan, Terrance Chua

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Role of cardiac imaging in acute chest pain.The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Getting it right the first time: Stress-only MPI in the ER.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Imaging for chest pain in the emergency room: Finding the right gate not the right gatekeeper.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  11. ANMCO-SIMEU Consensus Document: in-hospital management of patients presenting with chest pain.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER.The British journal of radiology · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Acute chest pain evaluation: is there too much stress on the system?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Swee Han LimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore, gaelsh@sgh.com.sg.
Venkataraman Anantharaman
Felix Sundram
Edwin Shih-Yen Chan
Ee Sin Ang
Sui Lan Yo
Edward Jacob
Anthony Goh
Say Beng Tan
Terrance Chua
Singapore General Hospital · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGNational Heart Centre Singapore · SGSingapore Clinical Research Institute · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) often present atypically. In a randomized controlled trial, we studied whether adding stress myocardial perfusion imaging (SMPI) to an evaluation strategy for emergency department (ED) patients presenting with chest pain more effectively identifies patients with ACS.

methodsParticipants were randomized to standard ED chest pain protocol (clinical assessment) or standard protocol supplemented with SMPI results. During 6 hours of electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and serial cardiac markers (creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme, troponin), participants developing ST segment changes or elevated cardiac markers were admitted. Those with a negative observation period underwent SMPI (N = 1,004) or clinical assessment (N = 504) based on randomization, and admitted if their SMPI scan was abnormal or senior clinicians found a high or intermediate risk for ACS.

resultsSMPI participants had a significantly lower admission rate than clinical assessment participants (10.16% vs 18.45%), with no significant between-group differences in risk of cardiac events (CEs) after 30 days (0.40% vs 0.79%) or 1 year (0.70% vs 0.99%).

conclusionsWhen added to a standard triage strategy incorporating clinical evaluation, serial ECGs, and cardiac markers, SMPI improved clinical decision making for chest pain patients, significantly reducing the need for hospitalization without an increase in adverse CE rates at 30 days or 1 year.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingTriageAdultAgedChest PainCoronary AngiographyElectrocardiographyEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24026478
OpenAlexW1983383162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.