Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24026296›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2013

Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study.

Norair Airapetian, Julien Maizel, François Langelle, Santhi Samy Modeliar, Dimitrios Karakitsos, Herve Dupont, Michel Slama

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02741453 (Scanning of Bilateral Internal Jugular Veins With Ultrasound Prior to CVC Placement - Effect on Success and Complications), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02741453 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Scanning of Bilateral Internal Jugular Veins With Ultrasound Prior to CVC Placement - Effect on Success and Complications

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2016 to 2017Enrolled278ConditionsCentral Venous Catheterization, Ultrasonography, Critical CareArmsStandard Practice, Bilateral IJ Ultrasound Scanning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Norair AirapetianMedical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Nephrology, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France.
Julien Maizel
François Langelle
Santhi Samy Modeliar
Dimitrios Karakitsos
Herve Dupont
Michel Slama

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveQuick-look ultrasound with a skin mark (UM) has been frequently used for central vein cannulation. The aim of this study is to compare this method with landmark (LM) and ultrasound-guided (UG) cannulation of jugular and femoral veins by inexperienced operators.

designProspective randomized single-center study.

settingA medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university medical center. PATIENTS: Patients requiring jugular or femoral central cannula placement.

interventionEach inexperienced resident randomly inserted a central venous line using the UM, LM or UG technique. MEASUREMENTS AND

findingsThe primary outcome was the success rate, and secondary outcomes were the placement time, number of attempts, mechanical complication rate, and catheter colonization rate. A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned to the three groups. The mean age of patients included in the study was 65 ± 15 years, and the mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS2) was 57 ± 20. The success rate was higher in the UG group than in the LM and UM groups (100, 74, and 73 %, respectively; p = 0.01). The total number of mechanical complications was higher in the LM and UM groups than in the UG group (24 and 36 versus 0 %, respectively; p = 0.01). The number of attempts and the access time were higher in the LM group than in the UG group, but not compared with the UM group. No difference in terms of catheter colonization was observed between the three groups.

conclusionsUltrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular or femoral vein by inexperienced residents appears to be more reliable than the LM or UM methods and was associated with a lower mechanical complication rate among ICU patients.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceFemoral VeinJugular VeinsUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedCatheterization, Central VenousFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInternship and ResidencyMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.