Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24025994›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2013

In vivo reprogramming in inflammatory bowel disease.

A Wagnerova, R Gardlik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A WagnerovaFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Molecular Biomedicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
R Gardlik
Comenius University Bratislava · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The direct reprogramming of somatic cells has immense implications in various areas of medicine. Although remarkable progress has been made in developing novel reprogramming methods, the efficiency and fidelity of reprogramming still need to be improved. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involves chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract with a complex etiology caused by various genetic, immunological and environmental factors. Recently, the role of stem cells has been proposed in pathogenesis and therapy of IBD. However, the efficiency and the safety of the stem cell treatments depend on the origin of the stem cell and the administration method. We hypothesize that the reprogramming of the intestinal cells into a pluripotent state is of huge importance for IBD therapy and prevention. The vectors carrying reprogramming genes encoding pluripotency factors can be transferred to the damaged tissue, in this case the intestine, by means of invasive bacterial vectors able to colonize colon mucosa. Reconstruction of tissues in vivo might avoid problems encountered in tissue rebuilding in vitro because of lack of appropriate scaffolds and microenvironments. Herein we present a review of recent literature and a perspective of in vivo reprogramming in IBD using bacterial vectors and analyze the rationale for such approach.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingAnimalsBacteriaGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesIntestinal Mucosa

Identifiers

PMID24025994
OpenAlexW1964280542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.