Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24025918›Full record

SynthesisNuclear medicine communications2013

rhTSH-aided low-activity versus high-activity regimens of radioiodine in residual ablation for differentiated thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis.

Chao Ma, Limin Tang, Hongliang Fu, Jianing Li, Hui Wang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nuclear medicine communications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Health-related quality of life of thyroid cancer patients undergoing radioiodine therapy: a cohort real-world study in a reference public cancer hospital in Brazil.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao MaaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Xinhua Hospital School of Medicine Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai bDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Limin Tang
Hongliang Fu
Jianing Li
Hui Wang
XinHua Hospital · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of low-activity versus high-activity radioiodine regimens in thyroid remnant ablation for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) under recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) stimulation have been widely quoted but there has been no systematic review of the evidence. We undertook a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess the effects of low-activity radioiodine in thyroid remnant ablation in patients with DTC under rhTSH stimulation compared with high-activity radioiodine. Studies were obtained from computerized searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (all until September 2012). Randomized controlled trials were included. Altogether, 637 patients with DTC who participated in three trials for residual ablation were included. Overall, studies had a low risk of bias. We found no statistically significant differences between low-activity (1.11/1.85 GBq) and high-activity (3.7 GBq) radioiodine treatment aided by rhTSH in terms of successful ablation rates on the basis of diagnostic scans [odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-1.47, P=0.56], thyroglobulin levels (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38-1.15, P=0.14), and health-related quality of life (mean difference 0.07, 95% CI -0.96 to 1.09, P=0.9). In addition, the subgroup analysis of 1.11 versus 3.7 GBq (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46-1.49, P=0.53) and 1.85 versus 3.7 GBq (OR 1, 95% CI 0.23-4.35, P=1) also showed no significant differences. The lower activity of 1.11 GBq showed significant benefit in terms of reduction in adverse events including neck pain, radiation gastritis, and salivary dysfunction during and after ablation (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.93, P=0.02). Limited data from three randomized controlled trials suggested that an rhTSH-aided low radioiodine activity level of as low as 1.115 GBq may be sufficient for thyroid remnant ablation when compared with 3.7 GBq, with fewer common adverse effects in patients with metastasis-free DTC. Further evidence is needed to confirm the effects of low-activity radioiodine for thyroid remnant ablation. Radioiodine treatment of 1.11 GBq showed significant benefit in terms of reduction in adverse events including neck pain, radiation gastritis, and salivary dysfunction during and after ablation (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.93, P=0.02). rhTSH-aided low radioiodine activity levels of 1.11 and 1.85 GBq are sufficient for thyroid remnant ablation as compared with 3.7 GBq, with fewer common adverse effects in patients with metastasis-free DTC. A well-designed study that compares low-activity with high-activity radioiodine ablation is needed to fully understand the long-term adverse effects and relapse or metastases.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesHumansIodine RadioisotopesQuality of LifeRecombinant ProteinsThyroid NeoplasmsThyrotropinIodine RadioisotopesRecombinant ProteinsThyrotropin

Identifiers

PMID24025918
PMCPMC3815118
OpenAlexW2063599010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.