Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24025052›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2014

Bridge between neuroimmunity and traumatic brain injury.

Matthew L Kelso, Howard E Gendelman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Drosophila as a model to explore secondary injury cascades after traumatic brain injury.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cellular infiltration in traumatic brain injury.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Immunotherapy for Parkinson's disease.Neurobiology of disease · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew L Kelso
Howard E GendelmanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6045. mkelso@unmc.edu.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Targeted Neuro Protection of HIV-1 Associated Neurologic DiseaseP01MH064570 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GELBARD, HARRIS A · 2001 to 2014
$19.4M
Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug InteractionsP01DA028555 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOSKA, MICHAEL DOUGLAS · 2010 to 2019
$16.8M
Project 9 - Renal Drug Targeting for the Treatment of Lupus NephritisP20GM103480 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BRONICH, TATIANA K · 2012 to 2017
$13.3M
Neuroprotective Immunity and HIV DementiaR01NS034239 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Howard E Gendelman, R Lee Mosley · 1995 to 2026
$12.3M
Proteomics CoreP01NS043985 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOSKA, MICHAEL DOUGLAS · 2003 to 2012
$11.8M
Role of EAAT2 and AEG-1 in Astrocyte Dysfunction and NeurodegenerationP01NS031492 · NINDS · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI FISHER, PAUL B · 1993 to 2007
$10.9M
Nanomedicine and NeuroAIDSR01NS036126 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GENDELMAN, HOWARD E · 1997 to 2017
$5.7M
SMART HANDR01AG043540 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GENDELMAN, HOWARD E, POLUEKTOVA, LARISA Y · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043540NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA028555NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103480NIMH NIH HHS P01 MH064570NIMH NIH HHS P01 MH64570NINDS NIH HHS 2R01 NS034239NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS031492NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS043985NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS31492NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS43985NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034239NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036126NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS36126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of degenerative, infectious, inflammatory and traumatic diseases of the central nervous system includes a significant immune component. As to the latter, damage to the cerebral vasculature and neural cell bodies, caused by traumatic brain injury (TBI) activates innate immunity with concomitant infiltration of immunocytes into the damaged nervous system. This leads to proinflammatory cytokine and prostaglandin production and lost synaptic integrity and more generalized neurotoxicity. Engagement of adaptive immune responses follows including the production of antibodies and lymphocyte proliferation. These affect the tempo of disease along with tissue repair and as such provide a number of potential targets for pharmacological treatments for TBI. However, despite a large body of research, no such treatment intervention is currently available. In this review we will discuss the immune response initiated following brain injuries, drawing on knowledge gained from a broad array of experimental and clinical studies. Our discussion seeks to address potential therapeutic targets and propose ways in which the immune system can be controlled to promote neuroprotection.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHumansNeuroimmunomodulationNeuroprotective AgentsNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID24025052
PMCPMC4135046
OpenAlexW2076704068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.