Concussion in sports medicine ethics: policy, epistemic and ethical problems.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Shared Decision-Making: Some cautionary observations in the context of elite sport.Sports medicine - open · 2022
   Article
2. Concussion Reporting and Safeguarding Policy Development in British American Football: An Essential Agenda.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021
   Article
3. Two Sports, Two Systems, One Goal: A Comparative Study of Concussion Policies and Practices of the Australian Football League and Hockey Canada.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021
   Article
4. Pressure on Sports Medicine Clinicians to Prematurely Return Collegiate Athletes to Play After Concussion.Journal of athletic training · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Sports medicine and ethics.2013

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as