Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24024796›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2013

Sports medicine and ethics.

Daniela Testoni, Christoph P Hornik, P Brian Smith, Daniel K Benjamin, Ross E McKinney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What to Cover When You're Covering: Preparing the Sideline Physician for the Season.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Decisions about College Football during Covid-19: An Ethical Analysis.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniela Testonia Duke Clinical Research Institute and Universidade Federal de São Paulo.
Christoph P Hornik
P Brian Smith
Daniel K Benjamin
Ross E McKinney

Funding

Prevention of Invasive Candidiasis: PK, Safety, and Neurodevelopmental OutcomesR01HD057956 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, DANIEL K. · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
Mentorship of early-career pediatricians in quantitiative methods and therapeuticK24HD058735 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, DANIEL K. · 2009 to 2018
$1.5M
PHARMACOKINETICS OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN HIGH RISK INFANTSK23HD060040 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PHILLIP BRIAN · 2009 to 2012
$445k
NIAAA NIH HHS HHSN275201000003CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700051CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000003INICHD NIH HHS K23 HD060040NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD058735NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057956NIDDK NIH HHS HHSN267200700051C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians working in the world of competitive sports face unique ethical challenges, many of which center around conflicts of interest. Team-employed physicians have obligations to act in the club's best interest while caring for the individual athlete. As such, they must balance issues like protecting versus sharing health information, as well as issues regarding autonomous informed consent versus paternalistic decision making in determining whether an athlete may compete safely. Moreover, the physician has to deal with an athlete's decisions about performance enhancement and return to play, pursuit of which may not be in the athlete's long-term best interests but may benefit the athlete and team in the short term. These difficult tasks are complicated by the lack of evidence-based standards in a field influenced by the lure of financial gains for multiple parties involved. In this article, we review ethical issues in sports medicine with specific attention paid to American professional football.

Indexed as

AthletesConflict of InterestPersonal AutonomyAthletic PerformanceConfidentialityDecision MakingEthics, MedicalFootballGenetic TestingHumansInformed ConsentMarketing of Health ServicesPaternalismPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesPhysiciansSportsPerformance-Enhancing Substances

Identifiers

PMID24024796
PMCPMC3899648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.