Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24024204›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2013

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in humans.

Priyadharshanan Ariyaratnam, Mahmoud Loubani, Alyn H Morice

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Vasomotion of mice mesenteric arteries during low oxygen levels.European journal of medical research · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction in Humans: Tale or Myth.The open cardiovascular medicine journal · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lobar analysis of collapsibility indices to assess functional lung volumes in COPD patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priyadharshanan AriyaratnamDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham HU16 5JQ, UK.
Mahmoud Loubani
Alyn H Morice
Castle Hill Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is the elegant theory put forward more than six decades ago to explain regional variations in perfusion within the lung in certain animal species in response to localised restrictions in oxygenation. Although considerable progress has been made to describe the phenomenon at the macroscopic level and explain it at the microscopic level, we are far from a universal agreement about the process in humans. This review attempts to highlight some of the important evidence bases of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in humans and the significant gaps in our knowledge that would need bridging.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndothelial CellsHumansHypoxiaLungPerfusionVasoconstriction

Identifiers

PMID24024204
PMCPMC3762074
OpenAlexW2107821733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.