ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2013
The determinants of propofol induction time in anesthesia.
Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol with different doses of fentanyl during colonoscopy in elderly patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2016Trial
- Modeling drug retention as memory effects in obese patients using fractional and augmented models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Surgical Placement of Axillary Impella 5.5 With Regional Anesthesia and Monitored Anesthesia Care.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2023Article
- Race/Ethnicity and Duration of Anesthesia for Pediatric Patients in the US: a Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023Article
- Do we need to adjust the effect-site concentration of propofol in patients undergoing chemotherapy?Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Assessing rheoencephalography dynamics through analysis of the interactions among brain and cardiac networks during general anesthesia.Frontiers in network physiology · 2022Article
- Effect of Auricular Acupuncture on Propofol Induction Dose: Could Vagus Nerve and Parasympathetic Stimulation Replace Intravenous Co-Induction Agents?Medical acupuncture · 2019Article
- Automation of anaesthesia: a review on multivariable control.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2015Review
- Determination of Induction Time in Adult Patients with Valvular Heart Disease.Indian heart journalArticle
- High daily caffeine intake is associated with lower propofol requirements for anesthetic induction.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe required dose of anesthetics is generally smaller in patients with low cardiac output (CO). A high CO decreases the blood concentration of anesthetics during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. However, a high CO may also shorten the delivery time of anesthetics to the effect site, e.g. the brain. We assessed the time required for induction of anesthesia with propofol administered by target-controlled infusion (TCI), and investigated factors that modify the pharmacodynamics of propofol.
methodsAfter measuring CO and blood volume (BV) by dye densitometry, propofol was infused using TCI to simulate a plasma concentration of 3 µg/ml. After infusion, the time taken to achieve bispectral index (BIS) values of 80 and 60 was determined. Age, sex, lean body mass (LBM), and cardiovascular parameters were analyzed as independent variables. The dependent variables were the time taken to achieve each BIS value and the plasma concentration of propofol (Cp) 10 min after the commencement of infusion.
resultsMultiple regression analysis revealed that a high CO significantly reduced the time taken to reach the first end point (P = 0.020, R(2) = 0.076). Age and LBM significantly prolonged the time taken to reach the second end point (P = 0.001). Cp was negatively correlated with BV (P = 0.020, R(2) = 0.073).
conclusionsCardiac output was a statistically significant factor for predicting the time required for induction of anesthesia in the initial phase, whereas, age and LBM were significant variables in the late phase. The pharmacodynamics of propofol was intricately altered by CO, age, and LBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.