ArticlePloS one2013
The evolutionary fate of phenotypic plasticity and functional traits under domestication in manioc: changes in stem biomechanics and the appearance of stem brittleness.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic Plasticity Beyond Domestication: Trait- and Accession-Dependent Responses to Light inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Linking anatomical diversity with functional life strategies in a liana community of central Africa.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Commensal domestication pathways amongst plants: exploring segetal and ruderal crop origins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- The sleeping crops of eastern North America: a new synthesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Failure without Tears: Two-Step Attachment in a Climbing Cactus.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Selective signatures and high genome-wide diversity in traditional Brazilian manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Trellis-forming stems of a tropical lianaFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Artificial selection optimizes clonality in chaya (Cnidoscolus aconitifolius).Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Structural performance of a climbing cactus: making the most of softness.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- The domestication syndrome in vegetatively propagated field crops.Annals of botany · 2020Article
- A population genomics appraisal suggests independent dispersals for bitter and sweet manioc in Brazilian Amazonia.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- The Impact of Domestication on Aboveground and Belowground Trait Responses to Nitrogen Fertilization in Wild and Cultivated Genotypes of Chickpea (Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Assessing elements of an extended evolutionary synthesis for plant domestication and agricultural origin research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Potential functions of microRNAs in starch metabolism and development revealed by miRNA transcriptome profiling of cassava cultivars and their wild progenitor.BMC plant biology · 2015Article
- Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Domestication can influence many functional traits in plants, from overall life-history and growth form to wood density and cell wall ultrastructure. Such changes can increase fitness of the domesticate in agricultural environments but may negatively affect survival in the wild. We studied effects of domestication on stem biomechanics in manioc by comparing domesticated and ancestral wild taxa from two different regions of greater Amazonia. We compared mechanical properties, tissue organisation and wood characteristics including microfibril angles in both wild and domesticated plants, each growing in two different habitats (forest or savannah) and varying in growth form (shrub or liana). Wild taxa grew as shrubs in open savannah but as lianas in overgrown and forested habitats. Growth form plasticity was retained in domesticated manioc. However, stems of the domesticate showed brittle failure. Wild plants differed in mechanical architecture between shrub and liana phenotypes, a difference that diminished between shrubs and lianas of the domesticate. Stems of wild plants were generally stiffer, failed at higher bending stresses and were less prone to brittle fracture compared with shrub and liana phenotypes of the domesticate. Biomechanical differences between stems of wild and domesticated plants were mainly due to changes in wood density and cellulose microfibril angle rather than changes in secondary growth or tissue geometry. Domestication did not significantly modify "large-scale" trait development or growth form plasticity, since both wild and domesticated manioc can develop as shrubs or lianas. However, "finer-scale" developmental traits crucial to mechanical stability and thus ecological success of the plant were significantly modified. This profoundly influenced the likelihood of brittle failure, particularly in long climbing stems, thereby also influencing the survival of the domesticate in natural situations vulnerable to mechanical perturbation. We discuss the different selective pressures that could explain evolutionary modifications of stem biomechanical properties under domestication in manioc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.