ArticlePloS one2013
Publication pressure and burn out among Dutch medical professors: a nationwide survey.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why are medical and health-related studies not being published? A systematic review of reasons given by investigators.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Interventions to promote medical research integrity: a scoping review.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Mapping 60 Years of Psychophysiology: A Bibliometric Analysis of Journal Performance, Authorship Trends, and Thematic Evolution.Psychophysiology · 2025Review
- How faculty with critical care specialties learn in a university hospital: a qualitative phenomenological study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture.Research integrity and peer review · 2024Article
- The high cost of healing and teaching: a cross-sectional survey of burnout among academic physicians in Nigeria.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes.Communications psychology · 2023Review
- Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Is Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life and Anthropometric Measurements in University Professors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Factors affecting the scientific research ability and the corresponding countermeasures in clinical postgraduates.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Association between burnout and stigma in physicians.PloS one · 2023Article
- One size does not fit all: an exploratory interview study on how translational researchers navigate the current academic reward system.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Association between Burnout, Job Dissatisfaction and Intention to Leave among Medical Researchers in a Research Organisation in Malaysia during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Institution Origin and Medical School Rank Impact the Citation Frequency and Publication Rate in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Journals.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- The Job Demands in Predicting Burnout During COVID-19 Among Teaching Faculty at KSAU-HS, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Burnout Profiles Among Young Researchers: A Latent Profile Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Working 9 to 5, not the way to make an academic living: observational analysis of manuscript and peer review submissions over time.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Observational
- Professional self-concept and burnout among medical school faculty in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- Factors Associated with Burnout in Medical Academia: An Exploratory Analysis of Romanian and Moldavian Physicians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Building a Professional Identity and an Academic Career Track in Translational Medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublication of scientific research papers is important for professionals working in academic medical centres. Quantitative measures of scientific output determine status and prestige, and serve to rank universities as well as individuals. The pressure to generate maximum scientific output is high, and quantitative aspects may tend to dominate over qualitative ones. How this pressure influences professionals' perception of science and their personal well-being is unknown. METHODS AND
findingsWe performed an online survey inviting all medical professors (n = 1206) of the 8 academic medical centres in The Netherlands to participate. They were asked to fill out 2 questionnaires; a validated Publication Pressure Questionnaire and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. In total, 437 professors completed the questionnaires. among them, 54% judge that publication pressure 'has become excessive', 39% believe that publication pressure 'affects the credibility of medical research' and 26% judge that publication pressure has a 'sickening effect on medical science'. The burn out questionnaire indicates that 24% of medical professors have signs of burn out. The number of years of professorship was significantly related with experiencing less publication pressure. Significant and strong associations between burn out symptoms and the level of perceived publication pressure were found. The main limitation is the possibility of response bias.
conclusionA substantial proportion of medical professors believe that publication pressure has become excessive, and have a cynical view on the validity of medical science. These perceptions are statistically correlated to burn out symptoms. Further research should address the effects of publication pressure in more detail and identify alternative ways to stimulate the quality of medical science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.