Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24023807›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Hormonal contraception is associated with a reduced risk of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lenka A Vodstrcil, Jane S Hocking, Matthew Law, Sandra Walker, Sepehr N Tabrizi, Christopher K Fairley, Catriona S Bradshaw

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02432404 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Vaginal Contraceptive Ring on Vaginal Microbiota and Local Immunity

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2016 to 2021Enrolled81ConditionsBacterial VaginosisArmsNuvaRing
NCT02905890 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Hormonal Contraception and Bacterial Vaginosis (HCBV): The Effect of Norethisterone Enanthate on Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis Among Women at High Risk for HIV Infection in Kampala, Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2017 to 2019Enrolled250ConditionsBacterial Vaginosis, HIVArmsNorethisterone enantate, Condoms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Effect of Exogenous Sex Steroids on the Vaginal Microbiota: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The Role of the Microbiome in Endometriosis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025
    Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Carbohydrate Intake and Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Review.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2025
    Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lenka A VodstrcilSexual Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia ; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Hospital, Carlton, Australia ; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Jane S Hocking
Matthew Law
Sandra Walker
Sepehr N Tabrizi
Christopher K Fairley
Catriona S Bradshaw
University of Melbourne · AUMelbourne Sexual Health Centre · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association between hormonal contraception (HC) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) by systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsMedline, Web of Science and Embase databases were searched to 24/1/13 and duplicate references removed. Inclusion criteria 1) >20 BV cases; 2) accepted BV diagnostic method; 3) measure of HC-use either as combined oestrogen-progesterone HC (combined), progesterone-only contraception (POC) or unspecified HC (u-HC); 4) ≥ 10% of women using HC; 5) analysis of the association between BV and HC-use presented; 6) appropriate control group. Data extracted included: type of HC, BV diagnostic method and outcome (prevalent, incident, recurrent), and geographical and clinic-setting. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate pooled effect sizes (ES), stratified by HC-type and BV outcome. This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42013003699).

resultsOf 1713 unique references identified, 502 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 55 studies met inclusion criteria. Hormonal contraceptive use was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of prevalent BV (pooled effect size by random-effects [reES] = 0.68, 95%CI0.63-0.73), and in the relative risk (RR) of incident (reES = 0.82, 95%CI:0.72-0.92), and recurrent (reES = 0.69, 95%CI:0.59-0.91) BV. When stratified by HC-type, combined-HC and POC were both associated with decreased prevalence of BV and risk of incident BV. In the pooled analysis of the effect of HC-use on the composite outcome of prevalent/incident/recurrent BV, HC-use was associated with a reduced risk of any BV (reES = 0.78, 95%CI:0.74-0.82).

conclusionHC-use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of BV. This negative association was robust and present regardless of HC-type and evident across all three BV outcome measures. When stratified by HC-type, combined-HC and POC were both individually associated with a reduction in the prevalence and incidence of BV. This meta-analysis provides compelling evidence that HC-use influences a woman's risk of BV, with important implications for clinicians and researchers in the field.

Indexed as

ContraceptionFemaleHormonesHumansPrevalenceRiskVaginosis, BacterialHormones

Identifiers

PMID24023807
PMCPMC3762860
OpenAlexW2024230321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.