Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24023741›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Insights into the loblolly pine genome: characterization of BAC and fosmid sequences.

Jill L Wegrzyn, Brian Y Lin, Jacob J Zieve, William M Dougherty, Pedro J Martínez-García, Maxim Koriabine, Ann Holtz-Morris, Pieter deJong, Marc Crepeau, Charles H Langley and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Annotation of Siberian Larch (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. ConTEdb: a comprehensive database of transposable elements in conifers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Insights into conifer giga-genomes.Plant physiology · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jill L WegrzynDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Brian Y Lin
Jacob J Zieve
William M Dougherty
Pedro J Martínez-García
Maxim Koriabine
Ann Holtz-Morris
Pieter deJong
Marc Crepeau
Charles H Langley
Daniela Puiu
Steven L Salzberg
David B Neale
Kristian A Stevens

Funding

UC Santa Cruz Training Program In Genomic SciencesT32HG008345 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI BROOKS, ANGELA NORIE, GREEN, RICHARD EDWARD · 2015 to 2020
$1.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their prevalence and importance, the genome sequences of loblolly pine, Norway spruce, and white spruce, three ecologically and economically important conifer species, are just becoming available to the research community. Following the completion of these large assemblies, annotation efforts will be undertaken to characterize the reference sequences. Accurate annotation of these ancient genomes would be aided by a comprehensive repeat library; however, few studies have generated enough sequence to fully evaluate and catalog their non-genic content. In this paper, two sets of loblolly pine genomic sequence, 103 previously assembled BACs and 90,954 newly sequenced and assembled fosmid scaffolds, were analyzed. Together, this sequence represents 280 Mbp (roughly 1% of the loblolly pine genome) and one of the most comprehensive studies of repetitive elements and genes in a gymnosperm species. A combination of homology and de novo methodologies were applied to identify both conserved and novel repeats. Similarity analysis estimated a repetitive content of 27% that included both full and partial elements. When combined with the de novo investigation, the estimate increased to almost 86%. Over 60% of the repetitive sequence consists of full or partial LTR (long terminal repeat) retrotransposons. Through de novo approaches, 6,270 novel, full-length transposable element families and 9,415 sub-families were identified. Among those 6,270 families, 82% were annotated as single-copy. Several of the novel, high-copy families are described here, with the largest, PtPiedmont, comprising 133 full-length copies. In addition to repeats, analysis of the coding region reported 23 full-length eukaryotic orthologous proteins (KOGS) and another 29 novel or orthologous genes. These discoveries, along with other genomic resources, will be used to annotate conifer genomes and address long-standing questions about gymnosperm evolution.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Artificial, BacterialGenome, PlantPinus taedaRetroelementsRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID24023741
PMCPMC3762812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.