ArticlePloS one2013
Insights into the loblolly pine genome: characterization of BAC and fosmid sequences.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Annotation of Siberian Larch (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparative Genomics Analysis of Repetitive Elements in Ten Gymnosperm Species: "Dark Repeatome" and Its Abundance in Conifer andLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Insights from the first genome assembly of Onion (Allium cepa).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Comparative Repeat Profiling of Two Closely Related Conifers (Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A Field Guide to Eukaryotic Transposable Elements.Annual review of genetics · 2020Review
- Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) mitochondrial genome assembled using both short and long nucleotide sequence reads is currently the largest known mitogenome.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- The transcriptome of Pinus pinaster under Fusarium circinatum challenge.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- A Reference Genome Sequence for the European Silver Fir (G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Review
- Transcriptome analysis of Pinus halepensis under drought stress and during recovery.Tree physiology · 2018Article
- Review
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence and comparative analysis of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) with related species.PloS one · 2018Article
- ConTEdb: a comprehensive database of transposable elements in conifers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Sequence of the Sugar Pine Megagenome.Genetics · 2016Article
- Draft genome of the living fossil Ginkgo biloba.GigaScience · 2016Article
- An Ancient Transkingdom Horizontal Transfer of Penelope-Like Retroelements from Arthropods to Conifers.Genome biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Establishing gene models from the Pinus pinaster genome using gene capture and BAC sequencing.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Insights into conifer giga-genomes.Plant physiology · 2014Review
- Decoding the massive genome of loblolly pine using haploid DNA and novel assembly strategies.Genome biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite their prevalence and importance, the genome sequences of loblolly pine, Norway spruce, and white spruce, three ecologically and economically important conifer species, are just becoming available to the research community. Following the completion of these large assemblies, annotation efforts will be undertaken to characterize the reference sequences. Accurate annotation of these ancient genomes would be aided by a comprehensive repeat library; however, few studies have generated enough sequence to fully evaluate and catalog their non-genic content. In this paper, two sets of loblolly pine genomic sequence, 103 previously assembled BACs and 90,954 newly sequenced and assembled fosmid scaffolds, were analyzed. Together, this sequence represents 280 Mbp (roughly 1% of the loblolly pine genome) and one of the most comprehensive studies of repetitive elements and genes in a gymnosperm species. A combination of homology and de novo methodologies were applied to identify both conserved and novel repeats. Similarity analysis estimated a repetitive content of 27% that included both full and partial elements. When combined with the de novo investigation, the estimate increased to almost 86%. Over 60% of the repetitive sequence consists of full or partial LTR (long terminal repeat) retrotransposons. Through de novo approaches, 6,270 novel, full-length transposable element families and 9,415 sub-families were identified. Among those 6,270 families, 82% were annotated as single-copy. Several of the novel, high-copy families are described here, with the largest, PtPiedmont, comprising 133 full-length copies. In addition to repeats, analysis of the coding region reported 23 full-length eukaryotic orthologous proteins (KOGS) and another 29 novel or orthologous genes. These discoveries, along with other genomic resources, will be used to annotate conifer genomes and address long-standing questions about gymnosperm evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.