Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24023720›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Characterization of a mouse-adapted Staphylococcus aureus strain.

Silva Holtfreter, Fiona J Radcliff, Dorothee Grumann, Hannah Read, Sarah Johnson, Stefan Monecke, Stephen Ritchie, Fiona Clow, Christiane Goerke, Barbara M Bröker and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. GrowingInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  2. Surgical Humidification (HumiGardGlobal spine journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrated genomic and proteomic analysis of the mouse-adaptedCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. MonitoringLaboratory animals · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Virulence Mechanisms of Staphylococcal Animal Pathogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Human neutrophilsImmunological reviews · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Discovery ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Silva HoltfreterDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Fiona J Radcliff
Dorothee Grumann
Hannah Read
Sarah Johnson
Stefan Monecke
Stephen Ritchie
Fiona Clow
Christiane Goerke
Barbara M Bröker
John D Fraser
Siouxsie Wiles
University of Auckland · NZUniversität Greifswald · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More effective antibiotics and a protective vaccine are desperately needed to combat the 'superbug' Staphylococcus aureus. While in vivo pathogenicity studies routinely involve infection of mice with human S. aureus isolates, recent genetic studies have demonstrated that S. aureus lineages are largely host-specific. The use of such animal-adapted S. aureus strains may therefore be a promising approach for developing more clinically relevant animal infection models. We have isolated a mouse-adapted S. aureus strain (JSNZ) which caused a severe outbreak of preputial gland abscesses among male C57BL/6J mice. We aimed to extensively characterize this strain on a genomic level and determine its virulence potential in murine colonization and infection models. JSNZ belongs to the MLST type ST88, rare among human isolates, and lacks an hlb-converting phage encoding human-specific immune evasion factors. Naive mice were found to be more susceptible to nasal and gastrointestinal colonization with JSNZ than with the human-derived Newman strain. Furthermore, naïve mice required antibiotic pre-treatment to become colonized with Newman. In contrast, JSNZ was able to colonize mice in the absence of antibiotic treatment suggesting that this strain can compete with the natural flora for space and nutrients. In a renal abscess model, JSNZ caused more severe disease than Newman with greater weight loss and bacterial burden. In contrast to most other clinical isolates, JSNZ can also be readily genetically modified by phage transduction and electroporation. In conclusion, the mouse-adapted strain JSNZ may represent a valuable tool for studying aspects of mucosal colonization and for screening novel vaccines and therapies directed at preventing colonization.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMultilocus Sequence TypingStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusVirulence

Identifiers

PMID24023720
PMCPMC3759423
OpenAlexW2006000956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.