ArticlePloS one2013
Induced fungal resistance to insect grazing: reciprocal fitness consequences and fungal gene expression in the Drosophila-Aspergillus model system.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wherefore the Magic? The Evolutionary Role of Psilocybin in Nature.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Contrasting effects of NADPH oxidases on the fungal hyphae growth and immune responses inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Mycophagy: A Global Review of Interactions between Invertebrates and Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Triazole Priming as an Adaptive Response and Gateway to Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Fungal Priming: Prepare or Perish.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cytoplasmic Lipases-A Novel Class of Fungal Defense Proteins Against Nematodes.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2021Article
- Fungal evolution: cellular, genomic and metabolic complexity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020Article
- Transport systems, intracellular traffic of intermediates and secretion of β-lactam antibiotics in fungi.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Pathogenic fungi-induced susceptibility is mitigated by mutual Lactobacillus plantarum in the Drosophila melanogaster model.BMC microbiology · 2019Article
- Primed to be strong, primed to be fast: modeling benefits of microbial stress responses.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2019Article
- Combining microfluidics and RNA-sequencing to assess the inducible defensome of a mushroom against nematodes.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Article
- TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- How fungi defend themselves against microbial competitors and animal predators.PLoS pathogens · 2018Article
- The remarkable plethora of infestation-responsive Q-type C2H2 transcription factors in potato.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Phenotypic responses to microbial volatiles render a mold fungus more susceptible to insect damage.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Fungal genotype determines survival of Drosophila melanogaster when competing with Aspergillus nidulans.PloS one · 2018Article
- Balancing selection for aflatoxin inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2017Article
- The Cell Wall Integrity Signaling Pathway and Its Involvement in Secondary Metabolite Production.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Identification of a Novel Nematotoxic Protein by Challenging the Model Mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea with a Fungivorous Nematode.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFungi are key dietary resources for many animals. Fungi, in consequence, have evolved sophisticated physical and chemical defences for repelling and impairing fungivores. Expression of such defences may entail costs, requiring diversion of energy and nutrients away from fungal growth and reproduction. Inducible resistance that is mounted after attack by fungivores may allow fungi to circumvent the potential costs of defence when not needed. However, no information exists on whether fungi display inducible resistance. We combined organism and fungal gene expression approaches to investigate whether fungivory induces resistance in fungi. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsHere we show that grazing by larval fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, induces resistance in the filamentous mould, Aspergillus nidulans, to subsequent feeding by larvae of the same insect. Larval grazing triggered the expression of various putative fungal resistance genes, including the secondary metabolite master regulator gene laeA. Compared to the severe pathological effects of wild type A. nidulans, which led to 100% insect mortality, larval feeding on a laeA loss-of-function mutant resulted in normal insect development. Whereas the wild type fungus recovered from larval grazing, larvae eradicated the chemically deficient mutant. In contrast, mutualistic dietary yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, reached higher population densities when exposed to Drosophila larval feeding. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study presents novel evidence that insect grazing is capable of inducing resistance to further grazing in a filamentous fungus. This phenotypic shift in resistance to fungivory is accompanied by changes in the expression of genes involved in signal transduction, epigenetic regulation and secondary metabolite biosynthesis pathways. Depending on reciprocal insect-fungus fitness consequences, fungi may be selected for inducible resistance to maintain high fitness in fungivore-rich habitats. Induced fungal defence responses thus need to be included if we wish to have a complete conception of animal-fungus co-evolution, fungal gene regulation, and multitrophic interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.