Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24023587›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2013

Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study.

M R Gudavalli, T Potluri, G Carandang, R M Havey, L I Voronov, J M Cox, R M Rowell, R A Kruse, G C Joachim, A G Patwardhan and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01765751 (Cervical Distraction Minimal Intervention Development), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01765751 nacompletednot on this map

Cervical Distraction Minimal Intervention Development: Translating From Basic to Clinical Studies

TypeinterventionalSponsorPalmer College of ChiropracticRan2013 to 2013Enrolled48ConditionsNeck Pain, Pain in Arm, UnspecifiedArmsManual Cervical Distraction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cervical disc degeneration: important considerations for the manual therapist.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M R GudavalliPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 741 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803, USA.
T Potluri
G Carandang
R M Havey
L I Voronov
J M Cox
R M Rowell
R A Kruse
G C Joachim
A G Patwardhan
C N R Henderson
C Goertz
Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USPalmer College of Chiropractic · USLoyola University Chicago · US

Funding

Developmental Center for Clinical and Translational Science in ChiropracticU19AT004663 · NCCIH · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI GOERTZ, CHRISTINE MARIE · 2008 to 2013
$3.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS U19 AT004663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to measure intradiscal pressure (IDP) changes in the lower cervical spine during a manual cervical distraction (MCD) procedure. Incisions were made anteriorly, and pressure transducers were inserted into each nucleus at lower cervical discs. Four skilled doctors of chiropractic (DCs) performed MCD procedure on nine specimens in prone position with contacts at C5 or at C6 vertebrae with the headpiece in different positions. IDP changes, traction forces, and manually applied posterior-to-anterior forces were analyzed using descriptive statistics. IDP decreases were observed during MCD procedure at all lower cervical levels C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7. The mean IDP decreases were as high as 168.7 KPa. Mean traction forces were as high as 119.2 N. Posterior-to-anterior forces applied during manual traction were as high as 82.6 N. Intraclinician reliability for IDP decrease was high for all four DCs. While two DCs had high intraclinician reliability for applied traction force, the other two DCs demonstrated only moderate reliability. IDP decreases were greatest during moving flexion and traction. They were progressevely less pronouced with neutral traction, fixed flexion and traction, and generalized traction.

Identifiers

PMID24023587
PMCPMC3762077
OpenAlexW2164722169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.