Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24022737›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2013

Treatment of osteochondral fractures of the knee: a meta-analysis of available scientific evidence.

Jan Kühle, Peter Angele, Peter Balcarek, Martin Eichinger, Matthias Feucht, Carl Haasper, Gohm Alexander, Tobias Jung, Helmut Lill, Bastian Marquass and 8 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan Kühle
Peter Angele
Peter Balcarek
Martin Eichinger
Matthias Feucht
Carl Haasper
Gohm Alexander
Tobias Jung
Helmut Lill
Bastian Marquass
Michael Osti
Ralf Rosenberger
Gian Salzmann
Matthias Steinwachs
Christine Voigt
Stephan Vogt
Johannes Zeichen
Philipp Niemeyer
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJohannes Wesling Klinikum Minden · DELandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATSchulthess-Klinik · CHUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough traumatic osteochondral fractures of the knee represent a common pathology of the knee joint, there is no general agreement concerning specific treatment of this entity. This meta-analysis was initiated in order to evaluate scientific evidence on different treatment options for acute osteochondral fractures of the knee.

methodsFor this purpose an OVID-based systematic literature search was performed including the following databases: MEDLINE, MEDLINE preprints, Embase, CINAHL, Life Science Citations, British National Library of Health and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The literature search period was from 1946 to January 2012, which led to the identification of 1,226 articles. After applying study-specific inclusion criteria a total of 19 studies with clinical follow-up of 638 patients were included. The methodology of these studies was systematically analysed by means of the Coleman Methodology Score. Outcome and success rates were evaluated depending on treatment applied.

resultsAll studies (n = 19) identified represent case series (evidence-based medicine level IV) and included a total of 638 patients. The average post-operative follow-up was 46 ± 27 months (range 3.75-108). The mean number of study subjects per study was 33 ± 44 patients (range 4-169). The average Coleman Methodology Score was 29 ± 17 points (range 5-72). Six different scoring systems were used for clinical assessment. The overall clinical success rate was 83% and varied between 45 and 100%.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis reveals a significant lack of scientific evidence for treatment of osteochondral fractures of the knee. No valid conclusion can be drawn from this study concerning the recommendation of a specific treatment algorithm. Nevertheless, the overall failure rate of 17% underlines that an acute osteochondral fracture of the knee represents an important pathology which is not a self-limiting injury and needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationFracture FixationFractures, BoneHumansKnee InjuriesKnee JointOrthopedic ProceduresTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24022737
PMCPMC3843186
OpenAlexW2004708142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.