Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24022156›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2013

Staying on target with CRISPR-Cas.

Dana Carroll

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Precise genome engineering inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Systemic Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting HPV Oncogenes Is Effective at Eliminating Established Tumors.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A review on advanced methods in plant gene targeting.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Correction of the Sickle Mutation in Human CD34+ cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Mapping the precision of genome editing.Nature biotechnology · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Making designer mutants in model organisms.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dana CarrollDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Associated ProteinsDeoxyribonuclease IDeoxyribonucleasesDNAEndonucleasesGenetic EngineeringHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutagenesisRNA, Small UntranslatedSequence Analysis, DNATrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDeoxyribonuclease IDeoxyribonucleasesDNAEndonucleasesRNA, Small UntranslatedTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24022156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.