Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24021539›Full record

SynthesisRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP2013

DDT/DDE and breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Susan Z Ingber, Melanie C Buser, Hana R Pohl, Henry G Abadin, H Edward Murray, Franco Scinicariello

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Exposure to environmental chemicals and cancer risk: epidemiological evidence from Japanese studies.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Epidemiology beyond its limits.Science advances · 2022
    Article
  10. Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Risk of Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan Z IngberDivision of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Melanie C Buser
Hana R Pohl
Henry G Abadin
H Edward Murray
Franco Scinicariello
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological basis for investigating dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) exposure and breast cancer risk stems from in vitro and animal studies indicating that DDT has estrogenic properties. The objective of this study was to update a meta-analysis from 2004 which found no association between dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) and breast cancer. We searched PubMed and Web of Science for studies published through June 2012 assessing DDT/DDE exposure and breast cancer. Summary Odds Ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the prevalence of breast cancer in the highest versus the lowest exposed groups for DDT and DDE. Difference of means of exposure for cases versus controls was analyzed for DDT and DDE. From the 500 studies screened, 46 were included in the meta-analysis. Slightly elevated, but not statistically significant summary ORs were found for DDE (1.05; 95% CI: 0.93-1.18) and DDT (1.02; 95% CI: 0.92-1.13). Lipid adjusted difference of means analysis found a significantly higher DDE concentration in cases versus controls (11.30 ng/g lipid; p=0.01). No other difference of means analysis found significant relationships. The existing information does not support the hypothesis that exposure to DDT/DDE increases the risk of breast cancer in humans.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDichlorodiphenyldichloroethaneDichlorodiphenyl DichloroethyleneEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansInsecticidesPrevalenceRisk FactorsDichlorodiphenyldichloroethaneDichlorodiphenyl DichloroethyleneInsecticidesBreast cancerDDEDDTMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID24021539
PMCPMC11298241
OpenAlexW2009436081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.