Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24021355›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior and evolution2013

The human frontal lobes: not relatively large but still disproportionately important? A commentary on Barton and Venditti.

Stephen H Montgomery

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Novel Practical Session to Teach Concepts of Allometric Scaling of Brain Structures to Undergraduate Students Using Vertebrate Brains.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Neural divergence and hybrid disruption between ecologically isolatedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Proportional versus relative size as metrics in human brain evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen H Montgomery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionNerve NetPhylogenyAnimalsCognitionFrontal LobeHumans

Identifiers

PMID24021355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.