Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24021306›Full record

ArticleVaccine2013

Willingness to participate in HIV vaccine efficacy trials among high risk men and women from fishing communities along Lake Victoria in Uganda.

Gershim Asiki, Andrew Abaasa, Eugene Ruzagira, Freddie Kibengo, Ubaldo Bahemuka, Jerry Mulondo, Janet Seeley, Linda-Gail Bekker, Sinead Delany, Pontiano Kaleebu and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gershim AsikiMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute, Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, P. O Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda. Electronic address: gershim.asiki@mrcuganda.org.
Andrew Abaasa
Eugene Ruzagira
Freddie Kibengo
Ubaldo Bahemuka
Jerry Mulondo
Janet Seeley
Linda-Gail Bekker
Sinead Delany
Pontiano Kaleebu
Anatoli Kamali
Uganda Virus Research Institute · UG

Funding

University of California, Berkeley (UCB)/University of *D43TW000003 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI REINGOLD, ARTHUR L · 1988 to 2013
$16.7M
Int'l Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies (ITAPS)R25MH064712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LINDAN, CHRISTINA P · 2002 to 2018
$3.4M
SHARP: Summer HIV/AIDS Research ProgramR25MH097591 · NIMH · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI FUCHS, JONATHAN D., MCFARLAND, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2016
$521k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000003FIC NIH HHS D43TW00003Medical Research Council MC_U950097145NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH064712NIMH NIH HHS R25MH064712-08NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH097591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV vaccine efficacy trials conducted in suitable populations are anticipated in sub-Saharan Africa. We assessed the willingness to participate in future vaccine trials among individuals from fishing communities along Lake Victoria, Uganda.

methodsFrom July to October 2012, we described a hypothetical vaccine trial to 328 (62.2% men) adults (18-49 years), at risk of HIV infection within 6 months of enrolment in a cohort and assessed their willingness to participate in the trial. Chi-square and logistic regression models were fitted to assess associations between vaccine trial attributes, participants' characteristics and willingness to participate.

resultsOverall, 99.4% expressed willingness to participate in the hypothetical HIV vaccine trial. This decreased marginally with introduction of particular vaccine trial attributes. Delaying pregnancy for 10 months and large blood draw had the largest effects on reducing willingness to participate to 93.5% (p=0.02) and 94.5% (p=0.01) respectively. All the vaccine trial attributes in combination reduced willingness to participate to 90.6%. This overall reduction in willingness to participate was significantly associated with gender and exchange of gifts for sex in multivariable analysis; women were more than three times as likely to have expressed unwillingness to participate in future vaccine trials as men (aOR=3.4, 95% CI: 1.55, 7.33) and participants who never received gifts in exchange for sex were more than four times as likely to have expressed unwillingness as those who received gifts for sex (aOR=4.5; 95%CI 1.30, 16.70). The main motivators of participation were access to HIV counselling and testing services (31.9%), HIV education (18.0%), hope of being prevented from acquiring HIV (16.6%) and health care (12.5%).

conclusionOur study identifies an important population for inclusion in future HIV prevention trials and provides important insights into acceptability of trial procedures, differences in decisions of women and men and areas for further participant education.

Indexed as

MotivationRisk-TakingAdolescentAdultAIDS VaccinesChi-Square DistributionClinical Trials as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLogistic ModelsMalePatient ParticipationPregnancySexual BehaviorAIDS VaccinesFishing communitiesUgandaVaccine trialsWillingness to participate

Identifiers

PMID24021306
PMCPMC4506465
OpenAlexW2171795120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.