Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24021222›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry2014

Relative effectiveness of reappraisal and distraction in regulating emotion in late-life depression.

Moria J Smoski, Kevin S LaBar, David C Steffens

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Depression in Relationships between Reappraisal Affordances, Choice, and Success.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review of Emotion Regulation in Late Life Mood Disorders.Journal of psychiatry and brain science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Depression: A cognitive perspective.Clinical psychology review · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Moria J SmoskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. Electronic address: moria.smoski@duke.edu.
Kevin S LaBarDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC.
David C SteffensDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD043446 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AMUNDSEN, CINDY · 2002 to 2023
$9.6M
Emotion Regulation in Late-Life Depression: Effectiveness and Neural MechanismsK23MH087754 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMOSKI, MORIA J. · 2009 to 2013
$684k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043446NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH087754NIMH NIH HHS K23-MH087754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study compares the effectiveness of two strategies, reappraisal and distraction, in reducing negative affect in older adults induced by focusing on personally relevant negative events and stressors.

participants30 adults with major depressive disorger (MDD) and 40 never-depressed (ND) comparison participants ages 60 years and over (mean age = 69.7 years). DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent three affect induction trials, each followed by a different emotion regulation strategy: distraction, reappraisal, and a no-instruction control condition. Self-reported affect was recorded pre- and post-affect induction, and at one-minute intervals during regulation.

resultsAcross groups, participants reported greater reductions in negative affect with distraction than reappraisal or the no-instruction control condition. An interaction between group and regulation condition indicated that distraction was more effective in reducing negative affect in the MDD group than the ND group.

conclusionsThese results suggest that distraction is an especially effective strategy for reducing negative affect in older adults with MDD. Finding ways to incorporate distraction skills into psychotherapeutic interventions for late-life MDD may improve their effectiveness, especially for short-term improvement of affect following rumination.

Indexed as

EmotionsPsychotherapyAgedAge of OnsetFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNorth Carolinadistractionemotion regulationLate-life depressionreappraisal

Identifiers

PMID24021222
PMCPMC3949222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.