Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24020075›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2013

A problem of persistence: still more questions than answers?

Nathalie Q Balaban, Kenn Gerdes, Kim Lewis, John D McKinney

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. OvercomingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Single-Cell Microfluidics: A Primer for Microbiologists.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024
    Review
  14. Bacterial persisters: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathalie Q BalabanThe Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel. nathalieqb@phys.huji.ac.il
Kenn Gerdes
Kim Lewis
John D McKinney

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current antibiotic resistance crisis has led to increased pressure to prioritize strategies to tackle the issue, with a strong focus being placed on the development of novel antimicrobials. However, one major obstacle that is often overlooked is persister cells, which are refractory to antibiotic treatment. Tackling persistence is a challenge because these cell types are extremely difficult to study and, consequently, little is known about their physiology and the factors that lead to their emergence. Here, four experts contemplate the main physiological features that define persistence and the implications of persistence for antibiotic treatment regimens, and consider what the study of bacterial persistence has taught us about the heterogeneity of bacterial populations.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsEvolution, MolecularHumansMicrobial ViabilityPhenotypeReactive Oxygen SpeciesSpecies SpecificityStress, PhysiologicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID24020075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.