Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24019965›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Voltage affects the dissociation rate constant of the m2 muscarinic receptor.

Yair Ben Chaim, Shimrit Bochnik, Itzchak Parnas, Hanna Parnas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Voltage Sensors Embedded in G Protein-Coupled Receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Voltage-Dependent Dopamine Potency at DFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Binding kinetics of ligands acting at GPCRs.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Allosteric sodium in class A GPCR signaling.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yair Ben ChaimDepartment of Natural and Life Sciences, The Open University of Israel, Ra'anana, Israel.
Shimrit Bochnik
Itzchak Parnas
Hanna Parnas
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILOpen University of Israel · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest protein family and mediate the vast majority of signal transduction processes in the body. Until recently GPCRs were not considered to be voltage dependent. Newly it was shown for several GPCRs that the first step in GPCR activation, the binding of agonist to the receptor, is voltage sensitive: Voltage shifts the receptor between two states that differ in their binding affinity. Here we show that this shift involves the rate constant of dissociation. We used the m2 muscarinic receptor (m2R) a prototypical GPCR and measured directly the dissociation of [(3)H]ACh from m2R expressed Xenopus oocytes. We show, for the first time, that the voltage dependent change in affinity is implemented by voltage shifting the receptor between two states that differ in their rate constant of dissociation. Furthermore, we provide evidence that suggest that the above shift is achieved by voltage regulating the coupling of the GPCR to its G protein.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsKineticsMembrane PotentialsProtein BindingReceptor, Muscarinic M2XenopusAcetylcholineReceptor, Muscarinic M2

Identifiers

PMID24019965
PMCPMC3760861
OpenAlexW2088978287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.