ArticlePloS one2013
Principles of regulation of self-renewing cell lineages.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling the evolutionary dynamics of clonal hematopoiesis.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- On Discretely Structured Growth Models and Their Moments.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Licensing and niche competition in spermatogenesis: mathematical models suggest complementary regulation of tissue maintenance.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Modelling post-chemotherapy stem cell dynamics in the bone marrow niche of AML patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A modelling framework for cancer ecology and evolution.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Spatial dynamics of feedback and feedforward regulation in cell lineages.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Regulatory feedback effects on tissue growth dynamics in a two-stage cell lineage model.Physical review. E · 2021Article
- Effect of feedback regulation on stem cell fractions in tissues and tumors: Understanding chemoresistance in cancer.Journal of theoretical biology · 2021Article
- Modelling stem cell ageing: a multi-compartment continuum approach.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Mathematical modeling reveals the factors involved in the phenomena of cancer stem cells stabilization.PloS one · 2019Article
- Stability of Control Networks in Autonomous Homeostatic Regulation of Stem Cell Lineages.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2018Article
- Mathematical modeling of the impact of cytokine response of acute myeloid leukemia cells on patient prognosis.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Optimizing homeostatic cell renewal in hierarchical tissues.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Determining the control networks regulating stem cell lineages in colonic crypts.Journal of theoretical biology · 2017Article
- The role of cell location and spatial gradients in the evolutionary dynamics of colon and intestinal crypts.Biology direct · 2016Article
- Near Equilibrium Calculus of Stem Cells in Application to the Airway Epithelium Lineage.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Delayed Onset of Symptoms Through Feedback Interference in Chronic Cancers.Convergent science physical oncology · 2016Article
- The Role of Symmetric Stem Cell Divisions in Tissue Homeostasis.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Analysis of stochastic stem cell models with control.Mathematical biosciences · 2015Article
- Stochastic dynamics of interacting haematopoietic stem cell niche lineages.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the exact regulatory circuits that can stably maintain tissue homeostasis is critical for our basic understanding of multicellular organisms, and equally critical for identifying how tumors circumvent this regulation, thus providing targets for treatment. Despite great strides in the understanding of the molecular components of stem-cell regulation, the overall mechanisms orchestrating tissue homeostasis are still far from being understood. Typically, tissue contains the stem cells, transit amplifying cells, and terminally differentiated cells. Each of these cell types can potentially secrete regulatory factors and/or respond to factors secreted by other types. The feedback can be positive or negative in nature. This gives rise to a bewildering array of possible mechanisms that drive tissue regulation. In this paper, we propose a novel method of studying stem cell lineage regulation, and identify possible numbers, types, and directions of control loops that are compatible with stability, keep the variance low, and possess a certain degree of robustness. For example, there are exactly two minimal (two-loop) control networks that can regulate two-compartment (stem and differentiated cell) tissues, and 20 such networks in three-compartment tissues. If division and differentiation decisions are coupled, then there must be a negative control loop regulating divisions of stem cells (e.g. by means of contact inhibition). While this mechanism is associated with the highest robustness, there could be systems that maintain stability by means of positive divisions control, coupled with specific types of differentiation control. Some of the control mechanisms that we find have been proposed before, but most of them are new, and we describe evidence for their existence in data that have been previously published. By specifying the types of feedback interactions that can maintain homeostasis, our mathematical analysis can be used as a guide to experimentally zero in on the exact molecular mechanisms in specific tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.