Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24019545›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2013

Tivozanib versus sorafenib as initial targeted therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from a phase III trial.

Robert J Motzer, Dmitry Nosov, Timothy Eisen, Igor Bondarenko, Vladimir Lesovoy, Oleg Lipatov, Piotr Tomczak, Oleksiy Lyulko, Anna Alyasova, Mihai Harza and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed, 21 pooled it
37.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 442 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatments for renal cell carcinoma: NICE Pilot Treatment Pathways Appraisal.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. SEOM SOGUG clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2022).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2014
    Guideline
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J MotzerRobert J. Motzer, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Dmitry Nosov, N.N. Blokhin Cancer Research Center; Boris Y. Alekseev, Federal State Institution, Moscow Research Oncological Institute, Moscow; Oleg Lipatov, State Budget Medical Institution, Republican Clinical Oncological Center, Bashkortostan; Anna Alyasova, Federal Budget Medical Institution, Privolzhsky District Medical Center, Nizhny Novgorod; Mikhail Kogan, State Budget Higher Educational Institute, The Rostov State Medical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia; Timothy Eisen, Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Igor Bondarenko, Dnipropetrovsk State Medical Academy under the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Dnipropetrovsk; Vladimir Lesovoy, V.I. Shapoval Regional Clinical Center for Urology and Nephrology, Kharkiv; Oleksiy Lyulko, Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Zaporizhia, Ukraine; Piotr Tomczak, Clinical Hospital No. 1 of the Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań; Cezary Szczylik, Military Institute of Health, Warsaw, Poland; Mihai Harza, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania; Cora N. Sternberg, San Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; David Cella, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; Andrew Krivoshik, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, IL; Cristina Ivanescu, Quintiles, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands; Brooke Esteves, Anna Berkenblit, Andrew Strahs, AVEO Oncology, Cambridge, MA; Thomas E. Hutson, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.
Dmitry Nosov
Timothy Eisen
Igor Bondarenko
Vladimir Lesovoy
Oleg Lipatov
Piotr Tomczak
Oleksiy Lyulko
Anna Alyasova
Mihai Harza
Mikhail Kogan
Boris Y Alekseev
Cora N Sternberg
Cezary Szczylik
David Cella
Cristina Ivanescu
Andrew Krivoshik
Andrew Strahs
Brooke Esteves
Anna Berkenblit
Thomas E Hutson
Privolzhsky Research Medical University · RU

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTivozanib is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1), -2, and -3. This phase III trial compared tivozanib with sorafenib as initial targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with metastatic RCC, with a clear cell component, prior nephrectomy, measurable disease, and 0 or 1 prior therapies for metastatic RCC were randomly assigned to tivozanib or sorafenib. Prior VEGF-targeted therapy and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor were not permitted. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review.

resultsA total of 517 patients were randomly assigned to tivozanib (n = 260) or sorafenib (n = 257). PFS was longer with tivozanib than with sorafenib in the overall population (median, 11.9 v 9.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.797; 95% CI, 0.639 to 0.993; P = .042). One hundred fifty-six patients (61%) who progressed on sorafenib crossed over to receive tivozanib. The final overall survival (OS) analysis showed a trend toward longer survival on the sorafenib arm than on the tivozanib arm (median, 29.3 v 28.8 months; HR, 1.245; 95% CI, 0.954 to 1.624; P = .105). Adverse events (AEs) more common with tivozanib than with sorafenib were hypertension (44% v 34%) and dysphonia (21% v 5%). AEs more common with sorafenib than with tivozanib were hand-foot skin reaction (54% v 14%) and diarrhea (33% v 23%).

conclusionTivozanib demonstrated improved PFS, but not OS, and a differentiated safety profile, compared with sorafenib, as initial targeted therapy for metastatic RCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHealth StatusHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingAntineoplastic AgentsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorSorafenibtivozanib

Identifiers

PMID24019545
PMCPMC5569677
OpenAlexW2157076786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.