Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24019196›Full record

Trial reportPsycho-oncology2014

Spiritual quality of life in advanced cancer patients receiving radiation therapy.

Katherine M Piderman, Mary E Johnson, Marlene H Frost, Pamela J Atherton, Daniel V Satele, Matthew M Clark, Maria I Lapid, Jeff A Sloan, Teresa A Rummans

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Examining the effect of peer helping in a coping skills intervention: a randomized controlled trial for advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients and their family caregivers.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perceived levels of collaboration between cancer patients and their providers during radiation therapy.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Understanding the impact of pulmonary arterial hypertension on patients' and carers' lives.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine M PidermanDepartment of Chaplain Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mary E Johnson
Marlene H Frost
Pamela J Atherton
Daniel V Satele
Matthew M Clark
Maria I Lapid
Jeff A Sloan
Teresa A Rummans
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USWinnMed · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
ACOSOG Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) Research BaseU10CA149950 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NELSON, HEIDI, SLOAN, JEFF A. · 2011 to 2014
$3.9M
Assessing PROMIS and other simple patient-reported measures for cancer researchR01CA154537 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SLOAN, JEFF A. · 2011 to 2016
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154537NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224NCI NIH HHS U10 CA149950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this randomized controlled trial for patients with advanced cancer receiving radiation therapy was to determine the effect of a multidisciplinary intervention on spiritual quality of life (QOL) at the end of the intervention (week 4) and at two follow-up time points (weeks 26 and 52).

methodsOne hundred thirty-one persons were randomized to either the intervention or control (forms only) groups. The intervention included six 90-min in-person sessions based on the physical, emotion, social, and spiritual domains of QOL. Three sessions included the spiritual component. Caregivers were present for four sessions, one which included a spiritual component. Ten follow-up phone calls were made to the patients in the intervention group during the 6-month follow-up period. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General Scale, the Linear Analog Self-Assessment which includes an assessment of spiritual QOL, and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT-Sp) at enrollment, and weeks 4, 27, and 52.

resultsFollowing the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated improved spiritual QOL on the FACIT-Sp, whereas the spiritual QOL of the control group decreased, resulting in significant mean changes between groups (total score: 1.7 vs. -2.9; p < 0.01; meaning/peace subscale: 1.0 vs. -3.5; p < 0.01; faith subscale: 3.1 vs. -1.7; p = 0.04).

conclusionsThe results indicate that a multidisciplinary intervention which includes a spiritual component can maintain the spiritual QOL of patients with advanced cancer during radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSpiritualityAgedChaplaincy Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsTreatment Outcomeadvanced canceroncologyquality of liferandomized controlled trialspiritualityspiritual well-being

Identifiers

PMID24019196
PMCPMC4332624
OpenAlexW1908449414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.