ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2014
Assessment of efficacy, safety and quality of life of 55 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with temsirolimus: a single-center experience in Japan.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of temsirolimus versus pazopanib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2025Review
- Real-world use of temsirolimus in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: recent consideration based on the results of a post-marketing, all-case surveillance study.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2020Observational
- Effect of Targeting Clusterin Using OGX-011 on Antitumor Activity of Temsirolimus in a Human Renal Cell Carcinoma Model.Targeted oncology · 2017Article
- A case of metastatic renal cell carcinoma showing complete remission after cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by temsirolimus.International cancer conference journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate experience of the use of temsirolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in a single center in Japan.
methodsThis study included 55 consecutive patients with mRCC who received temsirolimus in a routine clinical setting, and retrospectively reviewed the comprehensive outcomes of these patients.
resultsOf the 55 patients, 20 had a Karnofsky performance status of ≤80, and 5, 41 and 9 were classified into favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups, respectively, according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center model. Initially, 25 mg of temsirolimus was applied weekly; however, dose modification was required in 19 patients, resulting in a relative dose intensity of 90.5 % throughout this series. As the best responses to temsirolimus, 4, 44 and 7 were judged to have a partial response, stable disease and progressive disease, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients following the introduction of temsirolimus was 7.0 and 25.0 months, respectively. Of several factors examined, only the pretreatment C-reactive protein level was shown to be independently associated with both PFS and OS. The common adverse events related to temsirolimus corresponding to ≥grade 3 were anemia in 4, thrombocytopenia in 3, stomatitis in 3 and hyperglycemia in 3. Quality of life analysis using 36-Item Short Form showed that there were no significant differences in any scale scores between surveys performed before and 3 months after the introduction of temsirolimus.
conclusionsTemsirolimus was well tolerated and facilitated comparatively favorable cancer control in Japanese patients with mRCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24019183What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.