Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24019132›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy2013

Nanoscale markers of esophageal field carcinogenesis: potential implications for esophageal cancer screening.

Vani J A Konda, Lusik Cherkezyan, Hariharan Subramanian, Kirsten Wroblewski, Dhwanil Damania, Valentin Becker, Mariano Haba Ruiz Gonzalez, Ann Koons, Michael Goldberg, Mark K Ferguson and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tissue spatial correlation as cancer marker.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vani J A KondaCenter for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Lusik Cherkezyan
Hariharan Subramanian
Kirsten Wroblewski
Dhwanil Damania
Valentin Becker
Mariano Haba Ruiz Gonzalez
Ann Koons
Michael Goldberg
Mark K Ferguson
Irving Waxman
Hermant K Roy
Vadim Backman
University of Chicago Medical Center · USMcCormick (United States) · USBoston Medical Center · USTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Novel Biophotonics Methodology for Colon Cancer ScreeningR01CA128641 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BACKMAN, VADIM · 2008 to 2012
$7.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA128641NCI NIH HHS R01CA128641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsEsophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has a dismal prognosis unless treated early or prevented at the precursor stage of Barrett's esophagus-associated dysplasia. However, some patients with cancer or dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (DBE) may not be captured by current screening and surveillance programs. Additional screening techniques are needed to determine who would benefit from endoscopic screening or surveillance. Partial wave spectroscopy (PWS) microscopy (also known as nanocytology) measures the disorder strength (Ld ), a statistic that characterizes the spatial distribution of the intracellular mass at the nanoscale level and thus provides insights into the cell nanoscale architecture beyond that which is revealed by conventional microscopy. The aim of the present study was to compare the disorder strength measured by PWS in normal squamous epithelium in the proximal esophagus to determine whether nanoscale architectural differences are detectable in the field area of EAC and Barrett's esophagus.

methodsDuring endoscopy, proximal esophageal squamous cells were obtained by brushings and were fixed in alcohol and stained with standard hematoxylin and Cyto-Stain. The disorder strength of these sampled squamous cells was determined by PWS.

resultsA total of 75 patient samples were analyzed, 15 of which were pathologically confirmed as EAC, 13 were DBE, and 15 were non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus; 32 of the patients, most of whom had reflux symptoms, acted as controls. The mean disorder strength per patient in cytologically normal squamous cells in the proximal esophagus of patients with EAC was 1.79-times higher than that of controls (P<0.01). Patients with DBE also had a disorder strength 1.63-times higher than controls (P<0.01).

conclusionIntracellular nanoarchitectural changes were found in the proximal squamous epithelium in patients harboring distal EAC and DBE using PWS. Advances in this technology and the biological phenomenon of the field effect of carcinogenesis revealed in this study may lead to a useful tool in non-invasive screening practices in DBE and EAC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBarrett EsophagusCell Transformation, NeoplasticCytodiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopyMiddle AgedNanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID24019132
PMCPMC4195538
OpenAlexW2076827793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.