Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24019100›Full record

ArticleDemography2014

Genetic bio-ancestry and social construction of racial classification in social surveys in the contemporary United States.

Guang Guo, Yilan Fu, Hedwig Lee, Tianji Cai, Kathleen Mullan Harris, Yi Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guang GuoDepartment of Sociology and Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, CB#3210, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3210, USA, guang_guo@unc.edu.
Yilan Fu
Hedwig Lee
Tianji Cai
Kathleen Mullan Harris
Yi Li

Funding

Wave IV Data CollectionP01HD031921 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HARRIS, KATHLEEN MULLAN · 1994 to 2020
$86.1M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Add Health: A Genotype and Phenotype Resource for the Global Scientific CommunityR01HD073342 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HARRIS, KATHLEEN MULLAN · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
Social and Demographic Context and HeritabilityR03HD042490 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GUO, GUANG · 2002 to 2003
$143k
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD031921NICHD NIH HHS P01-HD31921NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073342NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD042490NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-reported race is generally considered the basis for racial classification in social surveys, including the U.S. census. Drawing on recent advances in human molecular genetics and social science perspectives of socially constructed race, our study takes into account both genetic bio-ancestry and social context in understanding racial classification. This article accomplishes two objectives. First, our research establishes geographic genetic bio-ancestry as a component of racial classification. Second, it shows how social forces trump biology in racial classification and/or how social context interacts with bio-ancestry in shaping racial classification. The findings were replicated in two racially and ethnically diverse data sets: the College Roommate Study (N = 2,065) and the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (N = 2,281).

Indexed as

Data CollectionPedigreeSocial IdentificationAdolescentChildEducational StatusFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleNational Longitudinal Study of Adolescent HealthRacial GroupsSelf ReportUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24019100
PMCPMC3951706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.