Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24019022›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2014

FRAP in pharmaceutical research: practical guidelines and applications in drug delivery.

Hendrik Deschout, Koen Raemdonck, Jo Demeester, Stefaan C De Smedt, Kevin Braeckmans

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Photoactivatable fluorescent probes reveal heterogeneous nanoparticle permeation through biological gels at multiple scales.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Light and life in Baltimore--and beyond.Biophysical journal · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hendrik DeschoutLaboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Koen Raemdonck
Jo Demeester
Stefaan C De Smedt
Kevin Braeckmans
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a fluorescence microscopy technique that has attracted a lot of interest in pharmaceutical research during the last decades. The main purpose of FRAP is to measure diffusion on a micrometer scale in a non-invasive and highly specific way, making it capable of measurements in complicated biomaterials, even in vivo. This has proven to be very useful in the investigation of drug diffusion inside different tissues of the body and in materials for controlled drug delivery. FRAP has even found applications for the improvement of several medical therapies and in the field of diagnostics. In this review, an overview is given of the different applications of FRAP in pharmaceutical research, together with essential guidelines on how to perform and analyse FRAP experiments.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiffusionDrug Delivery SystemsFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingHumans

Identifiers

PMID24019022
OpenAlexW2025463860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.