Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24018760›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2014

Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nadja Rickenbacher, Thomas Kötter, Michael M Kochen, Martin Scherer, Eva Blozik

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03357809 (Monocentric Study Evaluating the Efficiency and Safety of Anti-reflux Mucosectomy ARMS for the Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03357809 nasuspendednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Monocentric Study Evaluating the Efficiency and Safety of Anti-reflux Mucosectomy ARMS for the Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital St. Joseph, Marseille, FranceRan2017 to 2023Enrolled15ConditionsGERD, Gastro Esophageal RefluxArmsEndoscopic mucosal resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association consensus on the clinical care pathway for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: is laparoscopic fundoplication an effective treatment?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadja RickenbacherSwiss Federal Office of Public Health, 3003, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas Kötter
Michael M Kochen
Martin Scherer
Eva Blozik

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical, endoscopic, and open/laparoscopic surgical methods are used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing medical and surgical treatments of GERD in adult patients.

methodsFor the study, MEDLINE and EMBASE (1980-2012) were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed methodologic aspects and extracted data from eligible studies, focusing on patient-relevant outcomes. The primary outcomes were health-related and GERD-specific quality-of-life aspects. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) between treatment groups were calculated and combined using random-effect meta-analysis.

resultsThe study identified 11 publications reporting on 7 trials comparing surgical (open or laparoscopic) and medical treatment of GERD. Meta-analysis of both quality-of-life aspects showed a pooled-effect estimate in favor of fundoplication (SMD 0.18; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.35; SMD 0.33; 95 % CI 0.13-0.54). Heartburn and regurgitation were less frequent after surgical intervention. However, a considerable proportion of patients still needed antireflux medication after fundoplication. Nevertheless, the surgical patients were significantly more satisfied with their symptom control and showed higher satisfaction with the treatment received.

conclusionsThis systematic review showed that surgical management of GERD is more effective than medical management with respect to patient-relevant outcomes in the short and medium term. However, long-term studies still are needed to determine whether antireflux surgery is an equivalent alternative to lifelong medical treatment.

Indexed as

FundoplicationAdultAnti-Ulcer AgentsGastroesophageal RefluxHumansLaparoscopyProton Pump InhibitorsQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAnti-Ulcer AgentsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.