Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24018724›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

A biased competition account of attention and memory in Alzheimer's disease.

Kathrin Finke, Nicholas Myers, Peter Bublak, Christian Sorg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Relation Between Attention and Memory.Annual review of psychology · 2024
    Review
  6. Lower-Resolution Retrieval of Scenes in Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Attentional selection in visual perception, memory and action: a quest for cross-domain integration.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathrin FinkeDepartment of Psychology, General and Experimental Psychology/Neuro-cognitive Psychology, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München, , Munich, Germany.
Nicholas Myers
Peter Bublak
Christian Sorg
Jena University Hospital · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common view of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is that of an age-related memory disorder, i.e. declarative memory deficits are the first signs of the disease and associated with progressive brain changes in the medial temporal lobes and the default mode network. However, two findings challenge this view. First, new model-based tools of attention research have revealed that impaired selective attention accompanies memory deficits from early pre-dementia AD stages on. Second, very early distributed lesions of lateral parietal networks may cause these attention deficits by disrupting brain mechanisms underlying attentional biased competition. We suggest that memory and attention impairments might indicate disturbances of a common underlying neurocognitive mechanism. We propose a unifying account of impaired neural interactions within and across brain networks involved in attention and memory inspired by the biased competition principle. We specify this account at two levels of analysis: at the computational level, the selective competition of representations during both perception and memory is biased by AD-induced lesions; at the large-scale brain level, integration within and across intrinsic brain networks, which overlap in parietal and temporal lobes, is disrupted. This account integrates a large amount of previously unrelated findings of changed behaviour and brain networks and favours a brain mechanism-centred view on AD.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAlzheimer DiseaseAttentionCognitionField Dependence-IndependenceHumansMemoryParietal LobeVisual Perceptiondisconnection syndromeepisodic memoryfunctional connectivitymild cognitive impairmentparietal cortexvisual cognition

Identifiers

PMID24018724
PMCPMC3758205
OpenAlexW2110077904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.