ArticleJournal of community genetics2014
Knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing in those affected with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does genetic testing remain relevant in advanced Parkinson's disease?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Barriers to clinical genetic testing in movement disorders.Current opinion in neurology · 2025Review
- Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Genetic Testing Among Patients With Movement Disorders, Their Caregivers and Health Care Professionals.Journal of movement disorders · 2024Article
- Factors Influencing Patient Disclosure of Parkinson's Disease Genetic Testing Results to Relatives.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Article
- Readiness for Parkinson's disease genetic testing and counseling in patients and their relatives in urban settings in the Dominican Republic.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- Genetic Testing in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023Article
- A cross-sectional survey of genetic counselors providing carrier screening regarding GBA variants and Parkinson disease susceptibility.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- The Role of Genetic Testing for Parkinson's Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021Review
- Parkinson's Disease: Patients' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Interest in Genetic Counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- Measuring genetic knowledge: a brief survey instrument for adolescents and adults.Clinical genetics · 2016Article
- Perceptions and Attitudes About Genetic Counseling Among Residents of a Midwestern Rural Area.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Article
- Development and Validation of a Genomic Knowledge Scale to Advance Informed Decision Making Research in Genomic Sequencing.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in genetic tests provide valuable information for clinicians and patients around risks and inheritance of Parkinson's Disease (PD); however, questions arise whether those affected or at risk of PD will want genetic testing, particularly given that there are no preventive or disease-modifying therapies currently available. This study sought to determine knowledge and attitudes toward genetic testing for those affected with PD. A cross-sectional study was undertaken using a standardized questionnaire with six multi-choice genetic knowledge and 17 multi-choice attitude items. Participants were selected from a registry of people affected with PD living in Queensland, Australia. Half of the selected index cases had a family history of PD. Ordinal regression was used to evaluate the association between support for genetic testing and demographic, knowledge, and other attitudinal factors. The level of genetic knowledge was relatively low (37 % correct responses). The vast majority supported diagnostic testing (97 %) and 90 % would undertake a genetic test themselves. Support for predictive was lower (78 %) and prenatal genetic testing had the least support (58 %). Benefits of testing were identified as the ability to know the child's risk, seek therapies, and helping science with finding a cure. Concerns about genetic testing included potential emotional reactions and test accuracy. Genetic knowledge was not significantly associated with attitudes towards genetic testing. Patients with PD have strong interest in genetic testing for themselves with support for diagnostic testing but less support for predictive and prenatal testing. Genetic knowledge was unrelated to testing attitudes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.