Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24018567›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2013

Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Nicholas G Zaorsky, Amy S Harrison, Edouard J Trabulsi, Leonard G Gomella, Timothy N Showalter, Mark D Hurwitz, Adam P Dicker, Robert B Den

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03254420 (Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Late Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Two Image-Guided Strategies With Corresponding Treatment Margins.), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03254420 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Late Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Two Image-Guided Strategies With Corresponding Treatment Margins. (RCMIGI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2016 to 2028Enrolled74ConditionsProstate CancerArmsCalypso beacon implant, moderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Resistance to Radiotherapy in Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effect of external beam radiotherapy on second primary cancer risk after radical prostatectomy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  19. A Comparative Study on the Effects of PostoperativeJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas G ZaorskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Amy S Harrison
Edouard J Trabulsi
Leonard G Gomella
Timothy N Showalter
Mark D Hurwitz
Adam P Dicker
Robert B Den
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional treatment options for clinically localized, low-risk prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy, external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Advances in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) since the 1980s, the development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) during the 1990s and evidence from radiobiological models--which support the use of high doses per fraction--have developed alongside novel advanced radiotherapy modalities that include high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and proton beam therapy. The relationship between the outcomes of and toxicities experienced by patients with prostate cancer treated with HDR-BT, SBRT and particle-beam therapy should provide urologists and oncologists an understanding of the continually evolving technology in prostate radiotherapy. On the basis of published evidence, conventionally fractionated EBRT with IMRT is considered the standard of care over conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy, whereas HDR-BT boost is an acceptable treatment option for selected patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer. SBRT and proton therapy should not be used for patients (regardless of disease risk group) outside the setting of a clinical trial. Finally, comparative effectiveness research should be conducted to provide a framework for evaluating advanced radiotherapy technologies by comparing the benefits and harms of available therapeutic options to optimize the risk:benefit ratio and improve cost effectiveness.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Image-Guided

Identifiers

PMID24018567
OpenAlexW2023397502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.