ArticleNeuroImage2014
Reliability measures of functional magnetic resonance imaging in a longitudinal evaluation of mild cognitive impairment.
Article in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moxibustion modulates working memory in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2023Trial
- Gamma neuromodulation improves episodic memory and its associated network in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study.Neurobiology of aging · 2023Article
- Brain Reactions to Opening and Closing the Eyes: Salivary Cortisol and Functional Connectivity.Brain topography · 2022Article
- Reliability and stability challenges in ABCD task fMRI data.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Reliability of single-subject neural activation patterns in speech production tasks.Brain and language · 2021Article
- Intraclass correlation: Improved modeling approaches and applications for neuroimaging.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Tracking sentence comprehension: Test-retest reliability in people with aphasia and unimpaired adults.Journal of neurolinguistics · 2016Article
- Longitudinal development of frontoparietal activity during feedback learning: Contributions of age, performance, working memory and cortical thickness.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2016Article
- Brain imaging of neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.Acta neuropathologica · 2016Review
- Psychobiological operationalization of RDoC constructs: Methodological and conceptual opportunities and challenges.Psychophysiology · 2016Article
- Bringing memory fMRI to the clinic: comparison of seven memory fMRI protocols in temporal lobe epilepsy.Human brain mapping · 2015Article
- Mild cognitive impairment and fMRI studies of brain functional connectivity: the state of the art.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Review
- Attempted and successful compensation in preclinical and early manifest neurodegeneration - a review of task FMRI studies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the aging population grows, it has become increasingly important to carefully characterize amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), a preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a valuable tool for monitoring disease progression in selectively vulnerable brain regions associated with AD neuropathology. However, the reliability of fMRI data in longitudinal studies of older adults with aMCI is largely unexplored. To address this, aMCI participants completed two visual working tasks, a Delayed-Recognition task and a One-Back task, on three separate scanning sessions over a three-month period. Test-retest reliability of the fMRI blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activity was assessed using an intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis approach. Results indicated that brain regions engaged during the task displayed greater reliability across sessions compared to regions that were not utilized by the task. During task-engagement, differential reliability scores were observed across the brain such that the frontal lobe, medial temporal lobe, and subcortical structures exhibited fair to moderate reliability (ICC=0.3-0.6), while temporal, parietal, and occipital regions exhibited moderate to good reliability (ICC=0.4-0.7). Additionally, reliability across brain regions was more stable when three fMRI sessions were used in the ICC calculation relative to two fMRI sessions. In conclusion, the fMRI BOLD signal is reliable across scanning sessions in this population and thus a useful tool for tracking longitudinal change in observational and interventional studies in aMCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.