Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24018070›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Is laparoscopy a risk factor for bile duct injury during cholecystectomy?

Terrence M Fullum, Stephanie R Downing, Gezzer Ortega, David C Chang, Tolulope A Oyetunji, Kendra Van Kirk, Daniel D Tran, Ian Woods, Edward E Cornwell, Patricia L Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An Indian e-survey.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Laparoscopic Repair of Post-cholecystectomy Bile Duct Injury: an Advance in Surgical Management.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Terrence M FullumDivision of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, 2041 Georgia Ave NW, Ste 4100B, Washington, DC 20059, USA. tfullum@howard.edu.
Stephanie R Downing
Gezzer Ortega
David C Chang
Tolulope A Oyetunji
Kendra Van Kirk
Daniel D Tran
Ian Woods
Edward E Cornwell
Patricia L Turner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPreviously, risk factors for bile duct injury have been identified as acute cholecystitis, male gender, older age, aberrant biliary anatomy, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

methodsA retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2006 was performed with an inclusion criterion of cholecystectomy performed on hospital day 0 or 1. Patient- and hospital-level factors potentially associated with bile duct injury were examined by logistic regression.

resultsA total of 377,424 cholecystectomy patients were identified. There were 1124 bile duct injuries (0.30%), with 177 (0.06%) in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 947 (1.46%) in the open cholecystectomy group (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for bile duct injury were male gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.38; P = .006), age >60 years (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.61-3.09; P < .001), and academic hospital status (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05-1.79; P = .02). Acute cholecystitis was associated with a lower risk of bile duct injury (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99; P = .044).

conclusionIndependent risk factors for bile duct injury included male gender, age >60 years, and academic hospital status. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, obesity, insurance status, or hospital volume was not associated with an increased risk of bile duct injury.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsBile DuctsCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicFemaleHumansIatrogenic DiseaseIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24018070
PMCPMC3771752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.