Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24016491›Full record

Trial reportAmerican heart journal2013

Rationale and design of the Clarification of Optimal Anticoagulation through Genetics trial.

Stephen E Kimmel, Benjamin French, Jeffrey L Anderson, Brian F Gage, Julie A Johnson, Yves D Rosenberg, Nancy L Geller, Scott E Kasner, Charles S Eby, Jungnam Joo and 9 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American heart journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00839657 (A Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Use of Clinical Plus Genetic Information to Guide Warfarin Therapy Initiation and Improve Anticoagulation Control for Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00839657 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Use of Clinical Plus Genetic Information to Guide Warfarin Therapy Initiation and Improve Anticoagulation Control for Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Ran2009 to 2013Enrolled1,015ConditionsStroke, Venous Thrombosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial FlutterArmsGenotype-guided dosing algorithm for warfarin, Clinical-guided dosing algorithm for warfarin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The Impact of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Initiation on Early Warfarin Dosing.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2015
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Warfarin: The End or the End of One Size Fits All Therapy?Journal of personalized medicine · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Dosage error in article text
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen E KimmelPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: stevek@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Benjamin French
Jeffrey L Anderson
Brian F Gage
Julie A Johnson
Yves D Rosenberg
Nancy L Geller
Scott E Kasner
Charles S Eby
Jungnam Joo
Michael D Caldwell
Samuel Z Goldhaber
Robert G Hart
Denise Cifelli
Rosemary Madigan
Colleen M Brensinger
Suzanne Goldberg
Robert M Califf
Jonas H Ellenberg
University of Pennsylvania Health System · USNational Institutes of Health · USWashington University in St. Louis · USDuke Medical Center · USHarvard University · USMarshfield Clinic · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

PREDICTORS OF ANTICOAGULATION CONTROL ON WARFARINR01HL066176 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIMMEL, STEPHEN E. · 2001 to 2012
$7.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268200800003CNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL066176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent dosing practices for warfarin are empiric and result in the need for frequent dose changes as the international normalized ratio gets too high or too low. As a result, patients are put at increased risk for thromboembolism, bleeding, and premature discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. Prior research has identified clinical and genetic factors that can alter warfarin dose requirements, but few randomized clinical trials have examined the utility of using clinical and genetic information to improve anticoagulation control or clinical outcomes among a large, diverse group of patients initiating warfarin.

methodsThe COAG trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial comparing 2 approaches to guiding warfarin therapy initiation: initiation of warfarin therapy based on algorithms using clinical information plus an individual's genotype using genes known to influence warfarin response ("genotype-guided dosing") versus only clinical information ("clinical-guided dosing") (www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00839657).

resultsThe COAG trial design is described. The study hypothesis is that, among 1,022 enrolled patients, genotype-guided dosing relative to clinical-guided dosing during the initial dosing period will increase the percentage of time that patients spend in the therapeutic international normalized ratio range in the first 4 weeks of therapy.

conclusionThe COAG will determine if genetic information provides added benefit above and beyond clinical information alone.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodGenotypeHemorrhageHumansInternational Normalized RatioThromboembolismTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesWarfarinAnticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID24016491
PMCPMC4415273
OpenAlexW1978140999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.