ArticleACS nano2013
Versatile immunomagnetic nanocarrier platform for capturing cancer cells.
Article in ACS nano, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Tumor Cells in Cancer Diagnosis, Therapy, and Theranostics Applications: An Overview of Emerging Materials and Technologies.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Microfluidic biosensors for biomarker detection in body fluids: a key approach for early cancer diagnosis.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- Review
- Magnetic nanoparticles fabricated/integrated with microfluidics for biological applications: A review.Biomedical microdevices · 2024Review
- Programming an Enhanced Uptake and the Intracellular Fate of Magnetic Microbeads.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Progressing nanotechnology to improve targeted cancer treatment: overcoming hurdles in its clinical implementation.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- Immunomagnetic Isolation of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Cells Using a Microfluidic Device.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Laser Interference Lithography-A Method for the Fabrication of Controlled Periodic Structures.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Magnetic Nanoparticle-Mediated Heating for Biomedical Applications.Journal of heat transfer · 2022Article
- MoSBioactive materials · 2021Review
- Immunomagnetic Capture and Multiplexed Surface Marker Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells with Magnetic Multicolor Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Nanotags.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2020Article
- Scalable Signature-Based Molecular Diagnostics Through On-chip Biomarker Profiling Coupled with Machine Learning.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020Review
- Magnetic Iron Nanocubes Effectively Capture Epithelial and Mesenchymal Cancer Cells.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Recent advances in aptamer-based sensors for breast cancer diagnosis: special cases for nanomaterial-based VEGF, HER2, and MUC1 aptasensors.Mikrochimica acta · 2020Review
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Isolation and Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells on Microfluidic Devices.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Magnetically driven microfluidics for isolation of circulating tumor cells.Cancer medicine · 2020Review
- Capture and selective release of multiple types of circulating tumor cells using smart DNAzyme probes.Chemical science · 2020Article
- Development and Clinical Prospects of Techniques to Separate Circulating Tumor Cells from Peripheral Blood.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
- Nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis: progress, challenges and opportunities.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2019Review
- Development of a microfluidic platform for size-based hydrodynamic enrichment and PSMA-targeted immunomagnetic isolation of circulating tumour cells in prostate cancer.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sensitive and quantitative assessment of changes in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can help in cancer prognosis and in the evaluation of therapeutics efficacy. However, extremely low occurrence of CTCs in the peripheral blood (approximately one CTC per billion blood cells) and potential changes in molecular biomarkers during the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition create technical hurdles to the enrichment and enumeration of CTCs. Recently, efforts have been directed toward development of antibody-capture assays based on the expression of the common biomarker-the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) of epithelium-derived cancer cells. Despite some promising results, the assays relying on EpCAM capture have shown inconsistent sensitivity in clinical settings and often fail to detect CTCs in patients with metastatic cancer. We have addressed this problem by the development of an assay based on hybrid magnetic/plasmonic nanocarriers and a microfluidic channel. In this assay, cancer cells are specifically targeted by antibody-conjugated magnetic nanocarriers and are separated from normal blood cells by a magnetic force in a microfluidic chamber. Subsequently, immunofluorescence staining is used to differentiate CTCs from normal blood cells. We demonstrated in cell models of colon, breast, and skin cancers that this platform can be easily adapted to a variety of biomarkers, targeting both surface receptor molecules and intracellular biomarkers of epithelial-derived cancer cells. Experiments in whole blood showed capture efficiency greater than 90% when two cancer biomarkers are used for cell capture. Thus, the combination of immunotargeted magnetic nanocarriers with microfluidics provides an important platform that can improve the effectiveness of current CTC assays by overcoming the problem of heterogeneity of tumor cells in the circulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.