Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24016305›Full record

ArticleACS nano2013

Versatile immunomagnetic nanocarrier platform for capturing cancer cells.

Chun-Hsien Wu, Yu-Yen Huang, Peng Chen, Kazunori Hoshino, Huaying Liu, Eugene P Frenkel, John X J Zhang, Konstantin V Sokolov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. MoSBioactive materials · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chun-Hsien WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin , Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Yu-Yen Huang
Peng Chen
Kazunori Hoshino
Huaying Liu
Eugene P Frenkel
John X J Zhang
Konstantin V Sokolov
The University of Texas at Austin · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Optical Systems for In Vivo Molecular Imaging of CancerR01CA103830 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI RICHARDS-KORTUM, REBECCA R. · 2004 to 2015
$12.4M
Detection of CarcinomasR01CA139070 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ZHANG, XIAOJING · 2011 to 2013
$925k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA139070NCI NIH HHS R01 CA103830NCI NIH HHS R01CA103830NCI NIH HHS R01 CA139070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive and quantitative assessment of changes in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can help in cancer prognosis and in the evaluation of therapeutics efficacy. However, extremely low occurrence of CTCs in the peripheral blood (approximately one CTC per billion blood cells) and potential changes in molecular biomarkers during the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition create technical hurdles to the enrichment and enumeration of CTCs. Recently, efforts have been directed toward development of antibody-capture assays based on the expression of the common biomarker-the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) of epithelium-derived cancer cells. Despite some promising results, the assays relying on EpCAM capture have shown inconsistent sensitivity in clinical settings and often fail to detect CTCs in patients with metastatic cancer. We have addressed this problem by the development of an assay based on hybrid magnetic/plasmonic nanocarriers and a microfluidic channel. In this assay, cancer cells are specifically targeted by antibody-conjugated magnetic nanocarriers and are separated from normal blood cells by a magnetic force in a microfluidic chamber. Subsequently, immunofluorescence staining is used to differentiate CTCs from normal blood cells. We demonstrated in cell models of colon, breast, and skin cancers that this platform can be easily adapted to a variety of biomarkers, targeting both surface receptor molecules and intracellular biomarkers of epithelial-derived cancer cells. Experiments in whole blood showed capture efficiency greater than 90% when two cancer biomarkers are used for cell capture. Thus, the combination of immunotargeted magnetic nanocarriers with microfluidics provides an important platform that can improve the effectiveness of current CTC assays by overcoming the problem of heterogeneity of tumor cells in the circulation.

Indexed as

Immunomagnetic SeparationNanostructuresBiomarkers, TumorHumansMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24016305
PMCPMC3846426
OpenAlexW2013083692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.