Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24015924›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry2013

Bacterial actins and their diversity.

Ertan Ozyamak, Justin M Kollman, Arash Komeili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Structure of the magnetosome-associated actin-like MamK filament at subnanometer resolution.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Article
  11. X-ray and cryo-EM structures of monomeric and filamentous actin-like protein MamK reveal changes associated with polymerization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Magnetosome biogenesis in magnetotactic bacteria.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2016
    Review
  14. Bacterial cell biology outside the streetlight.Environmental microbiology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ertan OzyamakDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Justin M Kollman
Arash Komeili
University of California, Berkeley · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Organelle Assembly by the Prokaryotic Actin Homolog MamKR01GM084122 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KOMEILI, ARASH · 2009 to 2017
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084122NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM084122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many years, bacteria were considered rather simple organisms, but the dogmatic notion that subcellular organization is a eukaryotic trait has been overthrown for more than a decade. The discovery of homologues of the eukaryotic cytoskeletal proteins actin, tubulin, and intermediate filaments in bacteria has been instrumental in changing this view. Over the past few years, we have gained an incredible level of insight into the diverse family of bacterial actins and their molecular workings. Here we review the functional, biochemical, and structural features of the most well-studied bacterial actins.

Indexed as

ActinsAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacteriaBacterial ProteinsCytoskeletonEscherichia coli ProteinsPhylogenyActinsAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsFtsA protein, BacteriaMreB protein, E coliParM protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID24015924
PMCPMC4318550
OpenAlexW1999934090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.