ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutical investigation2013
Effect assessment of "film coating and packaging" on the photo-stability of highly photo-labile antihypertensive products.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutical investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tablet Color Changes Due to Light Irradiation and Titanium Dioxide: Color Change Prevention Using Plasticizers.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Pharmaceutical Film Coating: Past, Present, and Future.Drug design, development and therapy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLacidipine (LCDP) is chemically a "1, 4-dihydropyridine derivative" Ca+(2) channel blocker used as an antihypertensive. Type and extent of packaging have a strong influence on the photo-stability of the 1,4-dihydropyridine derivatives. In standard, light protection of drug substance/drug product can be obtained either by use of an opaque additive in the formulation that competitively absorbs or reflects light reaching the sample and/or by blocking the access of light to the drug through external protection by packaging. MATERIALS AND
methodsExternal protection by covering tablets with an opaque film coating involving a light-reflecting inorganic pigment such as titanium dioxide and/or by using an opaque impermeable packaging material was an appropriate suitable option for establishing photo-stability. Thus, the main objective of the present study was to optimize the % level of film coating in LCDP core tablets, and selection of a final packaging material and its respective extent, that is, primary, secondary and/or tertiary packaging, for LCDP tablets. RESULTS AND
conclusionThe main objective (% level of film coating) was optimized by directly exposing core tablets, 1% w/w, 2% w/w and 3% w/w film-coated tablets, to a light source as per Option-2 of ICH Q1B and its comparative analysis at the end of light exposure testing. The other objective (extent of drug product packaging) was established successfully by assessing whether or not an acceptable change has occurred at the end of the light exposure testing of the LCDP film-coated tablets in a direct exposure study or a primary immediate pack and/or secondary marketing pack.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.