Trial reportPloS one2013
Structural interactions within the default mode network identified by Bayesian network analysis in Alzheimer's disease.
Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Random support vector machine cluster analysis of resting-state fMRI in Alzheimer's disease.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Resting after learning facilitates memory consolidation and reverses spatial reorientation impairments in female 3xTg-AD mice.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Leveraging Technology to Diagnose Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Tau Pathology Profile Across a Parietal-Hippocampal Brain Network Is Associated With Spatial Reorientation Learning and Memory Performance in the 3xTg-AD Mouse.Frontiers in aging · 2021Article
- Altered connectivity of the default mode network in cognitively stable adults with Down syndrome: "Accelerated aging" or a prelude to Alzheimer's disease?Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Impaired Hippocampal-Cortical Interactions during Sleep in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease.Current biology : CB · 2020Article
- Brain structural alterations are distributed following functional, anatomic and genetic connectivity.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2018Article
- Resting-state connectivity in neurodegenerative disorders: Is there potential for an imaging biomarker?NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Review
- The Pathoconnectivity Profile of Alzheimer's Disease: A Morphometric Coalteration Network Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- Voxel-based meta-analysis of grey matter changes in Alzheimer's disease.Translational neurodegeneration · 2015Article
- Bayesian graphical network analyses reveal complex biological interactions specific to Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2015Article
- Bayesian networks in neuroscience: a survey.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a well-known neurodegenerative disease that is associated with dramatic morphological abnormalities. The default mode network (DMN) is one of the most frequently studied resting-state networks. However, less is known about specific structural dependency or interactions among brain regions within the DMN in AD. In this study, we performed a Bayesian network (BN) analysis based on regional grey matter volumes to identify differences in structural interactions among core DMN regions in structural MRI data from 80 AD patients and 101 normal controls (NC). Compared to NC, the structural interactions between the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and other brain regions, including the left inferior parietal cortex (IPC), the left inferior temporal cortex (ITC) and the right hippocampus (HP), were significantly reduced in the AD group. In addition, the AD group showed prominent increases in structural interactions from the left ITC to the left HP, the left HP to the right ITC, the right HP to the right ITC, and the right IPC to the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). The BN models significantly distinguished AD patients from NC with 87.12% specificity and 81.25% sensitivity. We then used the derived BN models to examine the replicability and stability of AD-associated BN models in an independent dataset and the results indicated discriminability with 83.64% specificity and 80.49% sensitivity. The results revealed that the BN analysis was effective for characterising regional structure interactions and the AD-related BN models could be considered as valid and predictive structural brain biomarker models for AD. Therefore, our study can assist in further understanding the pathological mechanism of AD, based on the view of the structural network, and may provide new insights into classification and clinical application in the study of AD in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.