Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24015294›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Development and validation of non-integrative, self-limited, and replicating minicircles for safe reporter gene imaging of cell-based therapies.

John A Ronald, Lorena Cusso, Hui-Yen Chuang, Xinrui Yan, Anca Dragulescu-Andrasi, Sanjiv Sam Gambhir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-invasive Reporter Gene Imaging of Cell Therapies, including T Cells and Stem Cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020
    Review
  5. How Non-invasiveFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. New imaging probes to track cell fate: reporter genes in stem cell research.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  8. Towards clinically translatableNature reviews. Materials · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Functional imaging for regenerative medicine.Stem cell research & therapy · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

John A RonaldMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America ; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Lorena Cusso
Hui-Yen Chuang
Xinrui Yan
Anca Dragulescu-Andrasi
Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Stanford University · USCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ES

Funding

Small Animal ImagingP50CA114747 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CONTAG, CHRISTOPHER H · 2005 to 2014
$18.2M
Reporter Imaging of Protein-Protein InteractionsR01CA082214 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 1999 to 2019
$5.9M
CIHRNCI NIH HHS P50 CA114747NCI NIH HHS P50CA114747NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reporter gene (RG) imaging of cell-based therapies provides a direct readout of therapeutic efficacy by assessing the fate of implanted cells. To permit long-term cellular imaging, RGs are traditionally required to be integrated into the cellular genome. This poses a potential safety risk and regulatory bottleneck for clinical translation as integration can lead to cellular transformation. To address this issue, we have developed non-integrative, replicating minicircles (MCs) as an alternative platform for safer monitoring of cells in living subjects. We developed both plasmids and minicircles containing the scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MAR) of the human interferon-beta gene, driven by the CMV promoter, and expressing the bioluminescence RG firefly luciferase. Constructs were transfected into breast cancer cells, and expanded S/MAR minicircle clones showed luciferase signal for greater than 3 months in culture and minicircles remained as episomes. Importantly, luciferase activity in clonal populations was slowly lost over time and this corresponded to a loss of episome, providing a way to reversibly label cells. To monitor cell proliferation in vivo, 1.5 × 10(6) cells carrying the S/MAR minicircle were implanted subcutaneously into mice (n = 5) and as tumors developed significantly more bioluminescence signal was noted at day 35 and 43 compared to day 7 post-implant (p<0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first work examining the use of episomal, self-limited, replicating minicircles to track the proliferation of cells using non-invasive imaging in living subjects. Continued development of S/MAR minicircles will provide a broadly applicable vector platform amenable with any of the numerous RG technologies available to allow therapeutic cell fate to be assessed in individual patients, and to achieve this without the need to manipulate the cell's genome so that safety concerns are minimized. This will lead to safe tools to assess treatment response at earlier time points and improve the precision of cell-based therapies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationAnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell Line, TumorDiagnostic ImagingFemaleGenes, ReporterHumansMiceMice, NudePlasmidsReplicon

Identifiers

PMID24015294
PMCPMC3756008
OpenAlexW1981183371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.