Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24015254›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Learning to obtain reward, but not avoid punishment, is affected by presence of PTSD symptoms in male veterans: empirical data and computational model.

Catherine E Myers, Ahmed A Moustafa, Jony Sheynin, Kirsten M Vanmeenen, Mark W Gilbertson, Scott P Orr, Kevin D Beck, Kevin C H Pang, Richard J Servatius

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine E MyersDepartment of Veterans Affairs, VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, New Jersey, United States of America ; Stress & Motivated Behavior Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosciences, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America ; Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America ; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Ahmed A Moustafa
Jony Sheynin
Kirsten M Vanmeenen
Mark W Gilbertson
Scott P Orr
Kevin D Beck
Kevin C H Pang
Richard J Servatius
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USVA New Jersey Health Care System · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

CRNS: Model of hippocampal-amygdala interaction: Implications for PTSDR01AA018737 · NIAAA · VETERANS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MYERS, CATHERINE E · 2009 to 2012
$747k
Acquisition and Expression of Avoidance: Computational Modeling and Human StudiesI01CX000771 · VA · VA NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI MYERS, CATHERINE E · 2013 to 2016
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000771NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018737PHS HHS NIAAA R01 AA018737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms include behavioral avoidance which is acquired and tends to increase with time. This avoidance may represent a general learning bias; indeed, individuals with PTSD are often faster than controls on acquiring conditioned responses based on physiologically-aversive feedback. However, it is not clear whether this learning bias extends to cognitive feedback, or to learning from both reward and punishment. Here, male veterans with self-reported current, severe PTSD symptoms (PTSS group) or with few or no PTSD symptoms (control group) completed a probabilistic classification task that included both reward-based and punishment-based trials, where feedback could take the form of reward, punishment, or an ambiguous "no-feedback" outcome that could signal either successful avoidance of punishment or failure to obtain reward. The PTSS group outperformed the control group in total points obtained; the PTSS group specifically performed better than the control group on reward-based trials, with no difference on punishment-based trials. To better understand possible mechanisms underlying observed performance, we used a reinforcement learning model of the task, and applied maximum likelihood estimation techniques to derive estimated parameters describing individual participants' behavior. Estimations of the reinforcement value of the no-feedback outcome were significantly greater in the control group than the PTSS group, suggesting that the control group was more likely to value this outcome as positively reinforcing (i.e., signaling successful avoidance of punishment). This is consistent with the control group's generally poorer performance on reward trials, where reward feedback was to be obtained in preference to the no-feedback outcome. Differences in the interpretation of ambiguous feedback may contribute to the facilitated reinforcement learning often observed in PTSD patients, and may in turn provide new insight into how pathological behaviors are acquired and maintained in PTSD.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalPunishmentRewardStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVeteransAdultHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24015254
PMCPMC3754989
OpenAlexW2142623222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.