Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24014530›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2013

BopA does not have a major role in the adhesion of Bifidobacterium bifidum to intestinal epithelial cells, extracellular matrix proteins, and mucus.

Veera Kainulainen, Justus Reunanen, Kaisa Hiippala, Simone Guglielmetti, Satu Vesterlund, Airi Palva, Reetta Satokari

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Viable and Heat-InactivatedMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Microbiome research reports · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Infant-DerivedMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. NovelFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. mBio · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Veera KainulainenDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Justus Reunanen
Kaisa Hiippala
Simone Guglielmetti
Satu Vesterlund
Airi Palva
Reetta Satokari
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of bifidobacteria to adhere to the intestine of the human host is considered to be important for efficient colonization and achieving probiotic effects. Bifidobacterium bifidum strains DSM20456 and MIMBb75 adhere well to the human intestinal cell lines Caco-2 and HT-29. The surface lipoprotein BopA was previously described to be involved in mediating adherence of B. bifidum to epithelial cells, but thioacylated, purified BopA inhibited the adhesion of B. bifidum to epithelial cells in competitive adhesion assays only at very high concentrations, indicating an unspecific effect. In this study, the role of BopA in the adhesion of B. bifidum was readdressed. The gene encoding BopA was cloned and expressed without its lipobox and hydrophobic signal peptide in Escherichia coli, and an antiserum against the recombinant BopA was produced. The antiserum was used to demonstrate the abundant localization of BopA on the cell surface of B. bifidum. However, blocking of B. bifidum BopA with specific antiserum did not reduce adhesion of bacteria to epithelial cell lines, arguing that BopA is not an adhesin. Also, adhesion of B. bifidum to human colonic mucin and fibronectin was found to be BopA independent. The recombinant BopA bound only moderately to human epithelial cells and colonic mucus, and it failed to bind to fibronectin. Thus, our results contrast the earlier findings on the major role of BopA in adhesion, indicating that the strong adhesion of B. bifidum to epithelial cell lines is BopA independent.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionBacterial ProteinsBifidobacteriumCaco-2 CellsCell MembraneCloning, MolecularEpithelial CellsEscherichia coliExtracellular Matrix ProteinsGenes, BacterialHT29 CellsHumansIntestinal MucosaLipoproteinsMembrane ProteinsMucusBacterial ProteinsExtracellular Matrix ProteinsLipoproteinsMembrane ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24014530
PMCPMC3811531
OpenAlexW2085652684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.