Trial reportNeurology2013
Randomized trial of cognitive speed of processing training in Parkinson disease.
Trial report in Neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Effects of Digital Health Interventions on Motor Symptoms, Nonmotor Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Patients With Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of cognitive rehabilitation in Parkinson disease: a meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for depression in individuals with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Cognitive training interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- (Neuro)Psychological Interventions for Non-Motor Symptoms in the Treatment of Patients with Parkinson's Disease: a Systematic Umbrella Review.Neuropsychology review · 2019Pooled it
- Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Learning ratio performance on a brief visual learning and memory test moderates cognitive training gains in Double Decision task in healthy older adults.GeroScience · 2024Trial
- Memory enhancement by multidomain group cognitive training in patients with Parkinson's disease and mild cognitive impairment: long-term effects of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Journal of neurology · 2021Trial
- Use, maintenance and dose effects of cognitive speed of processing training in Parkinson's disease.The International journal of neuroscience · 2017Trial
- Cognitive and Neural Effects of Vision-Based Speed-of-Processing Training in Older Adults with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2016Trial
- Improving functional disability and cognition in Parkinson disease: randomized controlled trial.Neurology · 2014Trial
- Phase I/II randomized trial of aerobic exercise in Parkinson disease in a community setting.Neurology · 2014Trial
- Identification of Cognitive Training for Individuals with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Speed of Processing Training for Stress Adaptation in Caregivers of a Family Member With Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Dose-response relationship between computerized cognitive training and cognitive improvement.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Exploring barriers and educational needs in implementing dual-task training for Parkinson's disease: insights from professionals.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of a home-based computerized cognitive training in Parkinson's disease: a pilot randomized cross-over study.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- Efficacy and Feasibility of Remote Cognitive Remediation Therapy in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the efficacy of cognitive speed of processing training (SOPT) among individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). Moderators of SOPT were also examined.
methodsEighty-seven adults, 40 years of age or older, with a diagnosis of idiopathic PD in Hoehn & Yahr stages 1-3 and on a stable medication regimen were randomized to either 20 hours of self-administered SOPT (using InSight software) or a no-contact control condition. Participants were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of training (or an equivalent delay). The primary outcome measure was useful field of view test (UFOV) performance, and secondary outcomes included cognitive self-perceptions and depressive symptoms.
resultsResults indicated that participants randomized to SOPT experienced significantly greater improvements on UFOV performance relative to controls, Wilks λ = 0.938, F 1,72 = 4.79, p = 0.032, partial η(2) = 0.062. Findings indicated no significant effect of training on secondary outcomes, Wilks λ = 0.987, F2,70 < 1, p = 0.637, partial η(2) = 0.013.
conclusionsPatients with mild to moderate stage PD can self-administer SOPT and improve their cognitive speed of processing, as indexed by UFOV (a robust predictor of driving performance in aging and PD). Further research should establish if persons with PD experience longitudinal benefits of such training and if improvements translate to benefits in functional activities such as driving. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that SOPT improves UFOV performance among persons in the mild to moderate stages of PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.