Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24014484›Full record

SynthesisHuman molecular genetics2014

Education influences the association between genetic variants and refractive error: a meta-analysis of five Singapore studies.

Qiao Fan, Robert Wojciechowski, M Kamran Ikram, Ching-Yu Cheng, Peng Chen, Xin Zhou, Chen-Wei Pan, Chiea-Chuen Khor, E-Shyong Tai, Tin Aung and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human molecular genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Myopia Genetics and Heredity.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. The Role of GJD2(Cx36) in Refractive Error Development.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mutational screening ofMolecular vision · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Qiao FanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health.
Robert Wojciechowski
M Kamran Ikram
Ching-Yu Cheng
Peng Chen
Xin Zhou
Chen-Wei Pan
Chiea-Chuen Khor
E-Shyong Tai
Tin Aung
Tien-Yin Wong
Yik-Ying Teo
Seang-Mei Saw
Singapore Eye Research Institute · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGGenome Institute of Singapore · SGJohns Hopkins Medicine · USNational University Health System · SGSingapore National Eye Center · SG

Funding

Gene-environment-wide interaction studies of ocular refractionK08EY022943 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WOJCIECHOWSKI, ROBERT J. · 2013 to 2017
$776k
NEI NIH HHS 1K08EY022943NEI NIH HHS K08 EY022943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refractive error is a complex ocular trait governed by both genetic and environmental factors and possibly their interplay. Thus far, data on the interaction between genetic variants and environmental risk factors for refractive errors are largely lacking. By using findings from recent genome-wide association studies, we investigated whether the main environmental factor, education, modifies the effect of 40 single nucleotide polymorphisms on refractive error among 8461 adults from five studies including ethnic Chinese, Malay and Indian residents of Singapore. Three genetic loci SHISA6-DNAH9, GJD2 and ZMAT4-SFRP1 exhibited a strong association with myopic refractive error in individuals with higher secondary or university education (SHISA6-DNAH9: rs2969180 A allele, β = -0.33 D, P = 3.6 × 10(-6); GJD2: rs524952 A allele, β = -0.31 D, P = 1.68 × 10(-5); ZMAT4-SFRP1: rs2137277 A allele, β = -0.47 D, P = 1.68 × 10(-4)), whereas the association at these loci was non-significant or of borderline significance in those with lower secondary education or below (P for interaction: 3.82 × 10(-3)-4.78 × 10(-4)). The evidence for interaction was strengthened when combining the genetic effects of these three loci (P for interaction = 4.40 × 10(-8)), and significant interactions with education were also observed for axial length and myopia. Our study shows that low level of education may attenuate the effect of risk alleles on myopia. These findings further underline the role of gene-environment interactions in the pathophysiology of myopia.

Indexed as

Educational StatusAxonemal DyneinsConnexinsGap Junction delta-2 ProteinGene-Environment InteractionGenetic LociGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRefractive ErrorsRisk FactorsSecreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsSingaporeAxonemal DyneinsConnexinsDNAH9 protein, humanGap Junction delta-2 ProteinIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsSecreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsSFRP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24014484
PMCPMC3869359
OpenAlexW2148593676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.