ArticleBMJ open2013
The work of commissioning: a multisite case study of healthcare commissioning in England's NHS.
Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using population risk prediction for healthcare planning: a qualitative study of healthcare planners' experiences and views.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Usability testing a web application to support evidence-based commissioning decisions for implementing mobile stroke units.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Collaboration between local authorities and civil society organisations for improving health: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Applying the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework to evaluate automated evidence synthesis in health behaviour change.Journal of health psychology · 2024Review
- A qualitative study of the barriers to commissioning social and therapeutic horticulture in mental health care.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The usage of data in NHS primary care commissioning: a realist evaluation.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- The usage of data in NHS primary care commissioning: a realist review.BMC medicine · 2023Review
- Clinical Perspectives on Using Remote Measurement Technology in Assessing Epilepsy, Multiple Sclerosis, and Depression: Delphi Study.JMIR neurotechnology · 2023Article
- Article
- Negotiating commissioning pathways for the successful implementation of innovative health technology in primary care.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Evaluating the design and implementation of the whole systems integrated care programme in North West London: why commissioning proved (again) to be the weakest link.BMC health services research · 2019Observational
- Transforming Integration through General Practice: Learning from a UK Primary Care Improvement Programme.International journal of integrated care · 2018Article
- Commissioning care for people with dementia at the end of life: a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- SCALS: a fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Making the case for a fracture liaison service: a qualitative study of the experiences of clinicians and service managers.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2015Article
- Evidence based policy making and the 'art' of commissioning - how English healthcare commissioners access and use information and academic research in 'real life' decision-making: an empirical qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Learning from contract change in primary care dentistry: A qualitative study of stakeholders in the north of England.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the work of commissioning care for people with long-term conditions and the factors inhibiting or facilitating commissioners making service change.
designMultisite mixed methods case study research, combining qualitative analysis of interviews, documents and observation of meetings.
participantsPrimary care trust managers and clinicians, general practice-based commissioners, National Health Service trust and foundation trust senior managers and clinicians, voluntary sector and local government representatives.
settingThree 'commissioning communities' (areas covered by a primary care trust) in England, 2010-2012.
resultsCommissioning services for people with long-term conditions was a long drawn-out process involving a range of activities and partners. Only some of the activities undertaken by commissioners, such as assessment of local health needs, coordination of healthcare planning and service specification, appeared in the official 'commissioning cycle' promoted by the Department of Health. Commissioners undertook a significant range of additional activities focused on reviewing and redesigning services and providing support for implementation of new services. These activities often involved partnership working with providers and other stakeholders and appeared to be largely divorced from contracting and financial negotiations. At least for long-term condition services, the time and effort involved in such work appeared to be disproportionate to the anticipated or likely service gains. Commissioners adopting an incremental approach to service change in defined and manageable areas of work appeared to be more successful in terms of delivering planned changes in service delivery than those attempting to bring about wide-scale change across complex systems.
conclusionsCommissioning for long-term condition services challenges the conventional distinction between commissioners and providers with a significant amount of work focused on redesigning services in partnership with providers. Such work is labour-intensive and potentially unsustainable at a time of reduced finances. New clinical commissioning groups will need to determine how best to balance the relational and transactional elements of commissioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.