ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2013
EUS access to the biliary tree.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- EUS-guided biliary drainage or enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgical anatomy and biliary obstruction: an international comparative study.Endoscopy international open · 2016Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as an alternative to percutaneous drainage and surgical bypass.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Review
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Treatment beyond Drainage: Hemostasis, Anastomosis, and Others.Clinical endoscopy · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EUS-guided biliary access procedures can target the gallbladder or the bile duct for drainage in selected cases. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage offers comparable results to percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis refractory to medical treatment. The procedure is not yet widely available. Novel lumen-apposing stents may improve long-term outcomes, resulting in rapid dissemination. EUS access to the bile duct is coupled with ERCP techniques into a hybrid procedure, endosono-cholangiopancreatography (ESCP). ESCP admits six variant approaches to bile duct drainage based on the combination of two access routes (intrahepatic and extrahepatic) with three drainage routes: transmural, retrograde transpapillary and antegrade transpapillary. A thousand ESCP cases have been reported to date with good outcomes. When the expertise is available, ESCP is increasingly replacing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to provide biliary drainage in patients in whom ERCP is not feasible, predominantly in the setting of palliation, but not limited to it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.