Trial reportObesity surgery2013
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banded plication: evolution of procedure and 2-year results.
Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Gastro-gastric intussusception in adults: a systematic review with exploratory statistical analysis.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banded Plication (Lagbp): Standardization of Surgical Technique and Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2016Article
- Laparoscopic Greater Curve Plication as an Outpatient Weight Loss Procedure.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic adjustable gastric banded plication (LAGBP) is a new restrictive bariatric procedure combining adjustable banding and greater curvature plication of the stomach. This study aimed to report the evolution of this surgical technique and analyze the surgical results.
methodsEighty patients who underwent LAGBP were enrolled in this study. The band-first technique was used in 50 patients from May 2009 to June 2011 and was then changed to the plication-first technique from July 2011 to October 2011. Patients' demographics and pre- and postoperative data, including complications and weight loss, were collected and analyzed.
resultsEighty patients (26 men and 54 women) with a mean age of 30.75 ± 8.68 years and a mean body mass index of 38.05 ± 4.73 kg/m2 were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 10.52 (1-24) months. The average operation duration and hospital stay were 92.85 ± 35.86 min and 1.73 ± 1.04 days, respectively. No intraoperative complications or surgical mortality was observed in this series. Four (8%) postoperative complications occurred with the band-first technique and one (3%) with the plication-first technique. Mean excess weight loss (percentage) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 42.59 ± 13.67, 56.38 ± 19.89, 57.59 ± 19.88, and 65.84 ± 17.36%, respectively. The frequency of band adjustment was 2.44 ± 2.21 times in 2 years.
conclusionsIn this present 2-year result, LAGBP using plication-first technique revealed fewer complications and good weight loss. Longer follow-up is still necessary to be accepted as a stand-alone bariatric procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24013809What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.